Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul;5(2):421-4.
doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.136214.

Mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation before colorectal surgery: A randomized prospective trial in a tertiary care institute

Affiliations

Mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation before colorectal surgery: A randomized prospective trial in a tertiary care institute

Asis Kumar Saha et al. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Background: In the first half of 20(th) century; mortality from colorectal surgery often exceeded 20%, mainly due to sepsis. Modern surgical techniques and improved perioperative care have significantly lowered the mortality rate. Mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) is aimed at cleansing the large bowel of fecal content thus reducing morbidity and mortality related to colorectal surgery. We carried out a study aimed to investigate the outcomes of colorectal surgery with and without MBPs, to avoid unpleasant side-effects of MBP and also to design a protocol for preparation of a patient for colorectal surgery.

Materials and methods: This was a prospective study over a period of March 2008-May 2010 carried out at Department of General Surgery of our institution. A total of 63 patients were included in this study; among those 32 patients were operated with MBPs and 31 without it; admitted in in-patient department undergoing resection of left colon and rectum for benign and malignant conditions in both emergency and elective conditions.

Results: Anastomotic leakage, intra-abdominal collections was detected clinically and radiologically in 2 and 4 patients in each group respectively. P > 0.5 in both situations, indicating statistically no difference between results of two groups. Wound infections were detected in 12 (37.5%) patients with MBP group and 11 (35.48%) patients without MBP.

Conclusion: The present results suggest that the omission of MBP does not impair healing of colonic anastomosis; neither increases the risk of leakage.

Keywords: Anastomotic leakage; colorectal surgery; pre-operative mechanical bowel preparation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Glenn F, McSherry CK. Carcinoma of the distal large bowel: 32-year review of 1,026 cases. Ann Surg. 1966;163:838–49. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Duxbury MS, Brodribb AJ, Oppong FC, Hosie KB. Management of colorectal cancer: Variations in practice in one hospital. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003;29:400–2. - PubMed
    1. Beck DE, Fazio VW. Current preoperative bowel cleansing methods. Results of a survey. Dis Colon Rectum. 1990;33:12–5. - PubMed
    1. Solla JA, Rothenberger DA. Preoperative bowel preparation. A survey of colon and rectal surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum. 1990;33:154–9. - PubMed
    1. Zinner M, Ashley S. 11th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2007. Maingot's Abdominal Operations; pp. 644–5.

LinkOut - more resources