Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Feb 17;2(1):e6.
doi: 10.2196/mhealth.2877.

A classification scheme for analyzing mobile apps used to prevent and manage disease in late life

Aiguo Wang  1 , Ning An, Xin Lu, Hongtu Chen, Changqun Li, Sue Levkoff
Affiliations

A classification scheme for analyzing mobile apps used to prevent and manage disease in late life

Aiguo Wang et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. .

Abstract

Background: There are several mobile apps that offer tools for disease prevention and management among older adults, and promote health behaviors that could potentially reduce or delay the onset of disease. A classification scheme that categorizes apps could be useful to both older adult app users and app developers.

Objective: The objective of our study was to build and evaluate the effectiveness of a classification scheme that classifies mobile apps available for older adults in the "Health & Fitness" category of the iTunes App Store.

Methods: We constructed a classification scheme for mobile apps according to three dimensions: (1) the Precede-Proceed Model (PPM), which classifies mobile apps in terms of predisposing, enabling, and reinforcing factors for behavior change; (2) health care process, specifically prevention versus management of disease; and (3) health conditions, including physical health and mental health. Content analysis was conducted by the research team on health and fitness apps designed specifically for older adults, as well as those applicable to older adults, released during the months of June and August 2011 and August 2012. Face validity was assessed by a different group of individuals, who were not related to the study. A reliability analysis was conducted to confirm the accuracy of the coding scheme of the sample apps in this study.

Results: After applying sample inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 119 apps were included in the study sample, of which 26/119 (21.8%) were released in June 2011, 45/119 (37.8%) in August 2011, and 48/119 (40.3%) in August 2012. Face validity was determined by interviewing 11 people, who agreed that this scheme accurately reflected the nature of this application. The entire study sample was successfully coded, demonstrating satisfactory inter-rater reliability by two independent coders (95.8% initial concordance and 100% concordance after consensus was reached). The apps included in the study sample were more likely to be used for the management of disease than prevention of disease (109/119, 91.6% vs 15/119, 12.6%). More apps contributed to physical health rather than mental health (81/119, 68.1% vs 47/119, 39.5%). Enabling apps (114/119, 95.8%) were more common than reinforcing (20/119, 16.8%) or predisposing apps (10/119, 8.4%).

Conclusions: The findings, including face validity and inter-rater reliability, support the integrity of the proposed classification scheme for categorizing mobile apps for older adults in the "Health and Fitness" category available in the iTunes App Store. Using the proposed classification system, older adult app users would be better positioned to identify apps appropriate for their needs, and app developers would be able to obtain the distributions of available mobile apps for health-related concerns of older adults more easily.

Keywords: Precede-Proceed Model (PPM); app; health care process; mHealth; management; mental health; physical health; prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proposed scheme for apps classification.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Selection of apps sample in August 2012.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Selection of apps sample in August 2011.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Selection of apps sample in June 2011.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Gavrilov LA, Heuveline P. Aging of Population. [2012-12-03]. http://longevity-science.org/Population_Aging.htm.
    1. Liu LQ, Rettenmaier AJ, Wang ZJ. The rising burden of health spending on seniors. [2012-12-03]. http://www.sepp-online.com/resources/The+Rising+Burden+of+Health+Spendin....
    1. Ellen B. Age-Based Health Care Rationing. United Press International. 2003. [2012-12-03]. http://www.globalaging.org/health/us/agebase.htm.
    1. Chernichovsky D, Markowitz S. Aging and aggregate costs of medical care: conceptual and policy issues. Health Econ. 2004 Jun;13(6):543–62. doi: 10.1002/hec.844. - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization. [2012-12-03]. Chronic diseases and their common risk factors http://www.who.int/chp/chronic_disease_report/media/Factsheet1.pdf.

LinkOut - more resources