Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul 21:7:24.
doi: 10.3389/fneng.2014.00024. eCollection 2014.

Acute human brain responses to intracortical microelectrode arrays: challenges and future prospects

Affiliations

Acute human brain responses to intracortical microelectrode arrays: challenges and future prospects

Eduardo Fernández et al. Front Neuroeng. .

Abstract

The emerging field of neuroprosthetics is focused on the development of new therapeutic interventions that will be able to restore some lost neural function by selective electrical stimulation or by harnessing activity recorded from populations of neurons. As more and more patients benefit from these approaches, the interest in neural interfaces has grown significantly and a new generation of penetrating microelectrode arrays are providing unprecedented access to the neurons of the central nervous system (CNS). These microelectrodes have active tip dimensions that are similar in size to neurons and because they penetrate the nervous system, they provide selective access to these cells (within a few microns). However, the very long-term viability of chronically implanted microelectrodes and the capability of recording the same spiking activity over long time periods still remain to be established and confirmed in human studies. Here we review the main responses to acute implantation of microelectrode arrays, and emphasize that it will become essential to control the neural tissue damage induced by these intracortical microelectrodes in order to achieve the high clinical potentials accompanying this technology.

Keywords: biocompatibility; in vivo recording; intracortical microelectrode; neural prosthesis; neurosurgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Photographs showing the silicon-based Utah Electrode Array (UEA) and representative results of its implantation into human cortex. (A) Scanning electron micrograph of the UEA. (B) Single-unit responses recorded with the UEA from human temporal cortex (47 superimposed traces). (C) Astrocytes, labeled here with anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein antibody (GFAP) increase the thickness of their main processes, especially around electrode tracks (asterisk). (D) Resident microglial cells and blood-borne macrophages, labeled here with anti-CD45 antibody, become activated and migrate toward the electrodes. Note the electrode track filled with blood cells (asterisk) and a nearby blood vessel. Calibration bars = 50 μm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Gross specimens of human temporal lobe implantations and scanning micrographs of the surface of the Utah Electrode Array after acute implantation in human brain. (A) Placement of an electrode array in temporal cortex. (B) Once the array has been removed there are some evident microhemorrhages. (C) Horizontal section showing blood in the outermost electrode tracks and petechial hemorrhages (white arrows) located below the tip of the electrodes. (D) Detail of the petechial hemorrhages. (E) Scanning electron micrograph of an electrode tip. Many red blood cells appear in close contact with electrode materials. (F) Detail of the red blood cells on the surface of the microelectrodes. Calibration bars A, B, C and D= 2 mm.

References

    1. Andersen R. A., Hwang E. J., Mulliken G. H. (2010). Cognitive neural prosthetics. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 61, 169–190, C1–C3 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100503 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barrese J. C., Rao N., Paroo K., Triebwasser C., Vargas-Irwin C., Franquemont L., et al. (2013). Failure mode analysis of silicon-based intracortical microelectrode arrays in non-human primates. J. Neural Eng. 10, 1–23 10.1088/1741-2560/10/6/066014 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beitz J. M. (2014). Parkinson’s disease: a review. Front. Biosci. (Schol. Ed.) 6, 65–74 10.2741/s415 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Calixto R., Salamat B., Rode T., Hartmann T., Volckaerts B., Ruther P., et al. (2013). Investigation of a new electrode array technology for a central auditory prosthesis. PLoS One 8:e82148 10.1371/journal.pone.0082148 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carmena J. M. (2013). Advances in neuroprosthetic learning and control. PLoS Biol. 11:e1001561 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001561 - DOI - PMC - PubMed