Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul 17:5:705.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00705. eCollection 2014.

Letters in the forest: global precedence effect disappears for letters but not for non-letters under reading-like conditions

Affiliations

Letters in the forest: global precedence effect disappears for letters but not for non-letters under reading-like conditions

Thomas Lachmann et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Normally skilled reading involves special processing strategies for letters, which are habitually funneled into an abstract letter code. On the basis of previous studies we argue that this habit leads to the preferred usage of an analytic strategy for the processing of letters, while non-letters are preferably processed via a holistic strategy. The well-known global precedence effect (GPE) seems to contradict to this assumption, since, with compound, hierarchical figures, including letter items, faster responses are observed to the global than to the local level of the figure, as well as an asymmetric interference effect from global to local level. We argue that with letters these effects depend on presentation conditions; only when they elicit the processing strategies automatized for reading, an analytic strategy for letters in contrast to non-letters is to be expected. We compared the GPE for letters and non-letters in central viewing, with the global stimulus size close to the functional visual field in whole word reading (6.5° of visual angle) and local stimuli close to the critical size for fluent reading of individual letters (0.5° of visual angle). Under these conditions, the GPE remained robust for non-letters. For letters, however, it disappeared: letters showed no overall response time advantage for the global level and symmetric congruence effects (local-to-global as well as global-to-local interference). We interpret these results as according to the view that reading is based on resident analytic visual processing strategies for letters.

Keywords: analytic processing; congruence effect; developmental dyslexia; global advantage effect; holistic processing; literacy; reading acquisition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Illustration of the hierarchical stimuli used in the experiment, left side: letters, right side non-letters. Leftmost column: congruent letter stimuli, of which the local and the global level consists of the same letters, C or F, respectively. Second column: incongruent letter stimuli, i.e., the global-level letters differ from the local level ones. Third column: congruent non-letter stimuli; right most column: incongruent non-letter stimuli.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Mean RT in ms for letter stimuli (left side) and non-letter stimuli (right side) for congruent and incongruent trials in the local and global trial blocks.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahmed L., Fockert J. W. (2012). Working memory load can both improve and impair selective attention: evidence from the navon paradigm. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 74 1397–1405 10.3758/s13414-012-0357-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amirkhiabani G. (1998). Relative size of global visual stimulus: advantage and interference. Percept. Motor Skills 86 1427–1441 10.2466/pms.1998.86.3c.1427 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amirkhiabani G., Lovegrove W. J. (1996). Role of eccentricity and size in the global precedence effect. J. Exp. Psychol. 22 1434–1447 10.1037/0096-1523.22.6.1434 - DOI
    1. Badian N. A. (2005). Does a visual-orthographic deficit contribute to reading disability? Ann. Dyslexia 55 28–52 10.1007/s11881-005-0003-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bavelier D., Deruelle C., Proksch J. (2000). Positive and negative compatibility effects. Percept. Psychophys. 62 100–112 10.3758/BF03212064 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources