Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep 23;111(7):1262-8.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.445. Epub 2014 Aug 7.

Refinement of the symptom screening in pediatrics tool (SSPedi)

C O'Sullivan  1 , L L Dupuis  2 , P Gibson  3 , D L Johnston  4 , C Baggott  5 , C Portwine  6 , B Spiegler  7 , S Kuczynski  8 , D Tomlinson  1 , S de Mol Van Otterloo  1 , G A Tomlinson  9 , L Sung  10
Affiliations

Refinement of the symptom screening in pediatrics tool (SSPedi)

C O'Sullivan et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Objective was to evaluate and refine a new instrument for paediatric cancer symptom screening named the Symptom Screening in Pediatrics Tool (SSPedi).

Methods: Respondents were children 8-18 years of age undergoing active cancer treatment and parents of eligible children. Respondents completed SSPedi once and then responded to semi-structured questions. They rated how easy or difficult SSPedi was to complete. For items containing two concepts, we asked respondents whether concepts should remain together or be separated into two questions. We also asked about each item's importance and whether items were missing. Cognitive probing was conducted in children to evaluate their understanding of items and the response scale. After each group of 10 children and 10 parents, responses were reviewed to determine whether modifications were required. Recruitment ceased with the first group of 10 children in which modifications were not required.

Results: Thirty children and 20 parents were required to achieve a final version of SSPedi. Fifteen items remain in the final version; the score ranges from 0 to 60.

Conclusions: Using opinions of children with cancer and parents of paediatric cancer patients, we successfully developed a symptom screening tool that is easy to complete, is understandable and demonstrates content validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of child and parent identification and enrolment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Final version of SSPedi.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ahmed N, Bestall JC, Payne SA, Noble B, Ahmedzai SH. The use of cognitive interviewing methodology in the design and testing of a screening tool for supportive and palliative care needs. Support Care Cancer. 2009;17 (6:665–673. - PubMed
    1. Alfven G. SMS pain diary: a method for real-time data capture of recurrent pain in childhood. Acta Paediatr. 2010;99 (7:1047–1053. - PubMed
    1. Baggott C, Dodd M, Kennedy C, Marina N, Matthay KK, Cooper BA, Miaskowski C. Changes in children's reports of symptom occurrence and severity during a course of myelosuppressive chemotherapy. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2010;27 (6:307–315. - PubMed
    1. Bordoni N, Cadile Mdel C, Sotelo R, Squassi A. Teachers' perception of oral health status. Design and validation of an evaluation instrument. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2006;19 (2:67–74. - PubMed
    1. Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ, Selmser P, Macmillan K. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care. 1991;7 (2:6–9. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources