Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep;16(9):596-603.
doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0018. Epub 2014 Aug 7.

Glycemic control among individuals with self-reported diabetes in India--the ICMR-INDIAB Study

Affiliations

Glycemic control among individuals with self-reported diabetes in India--the ICMR-INDIAB Study

Ranjit Unnikrishnan et al. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Aims: This study estimated the levels of glycemic control among subjects with self-reported diabetes in urban and rural areas of four regions in India.

Research design and methods: Phase I of the Indian Council of Medical Research-India Diabetes (ICMR-INDIAB) Study was conducted in a representative population of three states of India (Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, and Jharkhand) and one Union Territory (Chandigarh) and covering a population of 213 million people. Using a stratified multistage sampling design, individuals ≥20 years of age were recruited. Glycemic control among subjects with self-reported diabetes was assessed by measurement of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), estimated by the Variant™ II Turbo method (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).

Results: Among the 14,277 participants in Phase I of INDIAB, there were 480 subjects with self-reported diabetes (254 urban and 226 rural). The mean HbA1c levels were highest in Chandigarh (9.1±2.3%), followed by Tamil Nadu (8.2±2.0%), Jharkhand (8.2±2.4%), and Maharashtra (8.0±2.1%). Good glycemic control (HbA1c <7%) was observed only in 31.1% of urban and 30.8% of rural subjects. Only 22.4% of urban and 15.4% of rural subjects had reported having checked their HbA1c in the past year. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed younger age, duration of diabetes, insulin use, and high triglyceride levels to be significantly associated with poor glycemic control.

Conclusions: The level of glycemic control among subjects with self-reported diabetes in India is poor. Urgent action is needed to remedy the situation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

<b>FIG. 1.</b>
FIG. 1.
Mean glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) among subjects with self-reported diabetes (n=480) in four regions of India.
<b>FIG. 2.</b>
FIG. 2.
Age- and gender-specific mean glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) among subjects with self-reported diabetes. P for trend: urban, P=0.034 among female subjects; rural, P<0.001 among male subjects.
<b>FIG. 3.</b>
FIG. 3.
Frequency distribution of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) among subjects with self-reported diabetes.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. International Diabetes Federation: IDF Diabetes Atlas, 6th ed. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation, 2013
    1. Mohan V, Shah S, Saboo B: Current glycemic status and diabetes related complications among type 2 diabetes patients in India: data from the A1chieve Study. J Assoc Physicians India 2013;61(Suppl):12–15 - PubMed
    1. Raheja BS, Kapur A, Bhoraskar A, Sathe SR, Jorgensen LN, Moorthi SR, Pendsey S, Sahay BK: DiabCare Asia—India Study: diabetes care in India—current status. J Assoc Physicians India 2001;49:717–722 - PubMed
    1. Menon VU, Guruprasad U, Sundaram KR, Jayakumar RV, Nair V, Kumar H: Glycaemic status and prevalence of comorbid conditions among people with diabetes in Kerala. Natl Med J India 2008;21:112–115 - PubMed
    1. Nagpal J, Bhartia A: Quality of diabetes care in the middle- and high-income group populace: the Delhi Diabetes Community (DEDICOM) survey. Diabetes Care 2006;29:2341–2348 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources