Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Aug 8:14:574.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-574.

Protecting the underscreened women in developed countries: the value of HPV test

Affiliations

Protecting the underscreened women in developed countries: the value of HPV test

Raquel Ibáñez et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Poor attendance to cervical cancer (CC) screening is a major risk factor for CC. Efforts to capture underscreened women are considerable and once women agree to participate, the provision of longitudinal validity of the screening test is of paramount relevance. We evaluate the addition of high risk HPV test (HPV) to cervical cytology as a primary screening test among underscreened women in the longitudinal prediction of intraepithelial lesions grade 2 or worse (CIN2+).

Methods: Women were included in the study if they were older than 39 years and with no evidence of cervical cytology in the previous five years within the Public Primary Health Care System in Catalonia (Spain). 1,832 underscreened women from eight public primary health areas were identified during 2007-2008 and followed-up for over three years to estimate longitudinal detection of CIN2+. Accuracy of each screening test and the combination of both to detect CIN2+ was estimated. The risk of developing CIN2+ lesions according to histology data by cytology and HPV test results at baseline was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results: At baseline, 6.7% of participants were HPV positive, 2.2% had an abnormal cytology and 1.3% had both tests positive. At the end of follow-up, 18 out of 767 (2.3%) underscreened women had a CIN2+, two of which were invasive CC. The three-year longitudinal sensitivity and specificity estimates to detect CIN2+ were 90.5% and 93.0% for HPV test and 38.2% and 97.8% for cytology. The negative predictive value was >99.0% for each test. No additional gains in validity parameters of HPV test were observed when adding cytology as co-test. The referral to colposcopy was higher for HPV but generated 53% higher detection of CIN2+ compared to cytology.

Conclusions: Underscreened women had high burden of cervical disease. Primary HPV screening followed by cytology triage could be the optimal strategy to identify CIN2+ leading to longer and safe screen intervals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart for the selection of the study population. Underscreened women are defined as women older than 39 years and with no records on cervical cytology during the previous five years. CIN2+: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cumulative detection of CIN2+ according to baseline result of cytology and HPV testing. Detection of CIN2+ in underscreened women based on 767 women. Women were classified into 4 groups depending on the HPV and cytology results at baseline. Note that there is a higher risk of development CIN2+ in positive HPV women with normal cytology.

References

    1. Bosch FX, Lorincz A, Muñoz N, Meijer CJ, Shah KV. The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. J Clin Pathol. 2002;55:244–265. doi: 10.1136/jcp.55.4.244. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Quinn M, Babb P, Jones J, Allen E. Effect of screening on incidence of and mortality from cancer of cervix in England: evaluation based on routinely collected statistics. BMJ. 1999;318:904–908. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7188.904. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kyndi M, Frederiksen K, Krüger Kjaer S. Cervical cancer incidence in Denmark over six decades (1943–2002) Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85:106–111. doi: 10.1080/00016340500324423. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lindqvist PG, Hellsten C, Rippe A. Screening history of women in Malmö with invasive cervical cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;137:77–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.12.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Spayne J, Ackerman I, Milosevic M, Seidenfeld A, Covens A, Paszat L. Invasive cervical cancer: a failure of screening. Eur J Public Health. 2008;18:162–165. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckm043. - DOI - PubMed
Pre-publication history
    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/14/574/prepub

Publication types