An update on the current status of medical student urology education in the United States
- PMID: 25102786
- DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.06.003
An update on the current status of medical student urology education in the United States
Abstract
Objective: To provide an updated report on the status of urology education in the United States.
Methods: Forty-one randomly selected accredited medical schools in the United States were surveyed concerning their urology curriculum. All schools were included in the randomization, even those that had not produced any successful urology applicants during the past 5 years.
Results: In 48% of the schools, there were no urology lectures or coursework required before third-year clinical rotations. Two schools (5%) had a mandatory urology clinical clerkship. All schools offered an elective urology clerkship during either the third or fourth year of medical school. Fifty-five percent of medical schools used a core curriculum, and 31% based their curriculum on the American Urological Association's medical student core curriculum. Twenty-nine percent used Web-based resources during their clerkship, and 21% had a urology interest group.
Conclusion: This survey further reveals that there is a decline in exposure of medical students in the United States to formal urology teaching. In an attempt to minimize any possible adverse impact and to ensure that students are being exposed to the most important urologic topics and skills needed, some medical schools have instituted the use of a core curriculum in their clerkships. Despite the persistent decline in required medical student exposure to urology, urology residency programs remain extremely competitive.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The current status of medical student urological education in the United States.J Urol. 2008 Mar;179(3):1087-90; discussion 1090-1. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.10.068. Epub 2008 Jan 18. J Urol. 2008. PMID: 18206927
-
The continued decline of formal urological education of medical students in the United States: does it matter?J Urol. 2006 Jun;175(6):2243-7; discussion 2247-8. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00314-4. J Urol. 2006. PMID: 16697847
-
What every graduating medical student should know about urology: the stakeholder viewpoint.Urology. 2008 Apr;71(4):549-53. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.12.010. Urology. 2008. PMID: 18387383
-
The AUA Curriculum for Medical Students: Current Resources and Developments.Curr Urol Rep. 2019 Nov 28;20(12):86. doi: 10.1007/s11934-019-0944-y. Curr Urol Rep. 2019. PMID: 31781872 Review.
-
Urology in Undergraduate Medical Education.Curr Urol Rep. 2019 Oct 12;20(11):69. doi: 10.1007/s11934-019-0937-x. Curr Urol Rep. 2019. PMID: 31606783 Review.
Cited by
-
Undergraduate teaching of urology: Quo vadis?.Porto Biomed J. 2021 Jun 14;6(3):e135. doi: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000135. eCollection 2021 May-Jun. Porto Biomed J. 2021. PMID: 34136718 Free PMC article.
-
Strategies to Encourage Medical Student Interest in Urology.Curr Urol Rep. 2020 Aug 7;21(10):34. doi: 10.1007/s11934-020-00984-1. Curr Urol Rep. 2020. PMID: 32767185 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluating Urology Residency Applications: What Matters Most and What Comes Next?Curr Urol Rep. 2020 Aug 17;21(10):37. doi: 10.1007/s11934-020-00993-0. Curr Urol Rep. 2020. PMID: 32803400 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Urology Interest Groups and Surgical Skills Sessions - Increasing Medical Student Interest in Urology.Curr Urol Rep. 2025 May 7;26(1):39. doi: 10.1007/s11934-025-01269-1. Curr Urol Rep. 2025. PMID: 40332674 Review.
-
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Urology Residency Match in Singapore.Urology. 2020 Sep;143:272-273. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.05.037. Epub 2020 Jun 3. Urology. 2020. PMID: 32504688 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous