Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 Apr;22(2):366-77.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0699-x.

Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Free article
Meta-Analysis

Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: a meta-analysis

Jacky Au et al. Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Apr.
Free article

Abstract

Working memory (WM), the ability to store and manipulate information for short periods of time, is an important predictor of scholastic aptitude and a critical bottleneck underlying higher-order cognitive processes, including controlled attention and reasoning. Recent interventions targeting WM have suggested plasticity of the WM system by demonstrating improvements in both trained and untrained WM tasks. However, evidence on transfer of improved WM into more general cognitive domains such as fluid intelligence (Gf) has been more equivocal. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis focusing on one specific training program, n-back. We searched PubMed and Google Scholar for all n-back training studies with Gf outcome measures, a control group, and healthy participants between 18 and 50 years of age. In total, we included 20 studies in our analyses that met our criteria and found a small but significant positive effect of n-back training on improving Gf. Several factors that moderate this transfer are identified and discussed. We conclude that short-term cognitive training on the order of weeks can result in beneficial effects in important cognitive functions as measured by laboratory tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Psychol Rev. 2001 Apr;108(2):346-69 - PubMed
    1. Psychol Bull. 2005 Jan;131(1):61-5; author reply 72-5 - PubMed
    1. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Jun;92(6):1087-101 - PubMed
    1. Psychol Sci. 2013 Dec;24(12):2409-19 - PubMed
    1. Psychol Bull. 2005 Jan;131(1):66-71 - PubMed

Publication types