Financial exploitation of older adults: a population-based prevalence study
- PMID: 25103121
- PMCID: PMC4242880
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-014-2946-2
Financial exploitation of older adults: a population-based prevalence study
Abstract
Background: Financial exploitation is the most common and least studied form of elder abuse. Previous research estimating the prevalence of financial exploitation of older adults (FEOA) is limited by a broader emphasis on traditional forms of elder mistreatment (e.g., physical, sexual, emotional abuse/neglect).
Objectives: 1) estimate the one-year period prevalence and lifetime prevalence of FEOA; 2) describe major FEOA types; and 3) identify factors associated with FEOA.
Design: Prevalence study with a random, stratified probability sample.
Participants: Four thousand, one hundred and fifty-six community-dwelling, cognitively intact adults age ≥ 60 years.
Setting: New York State.
Main measures: Comprehensive tool developed for this study measured five FEOA domains: 1) stolen or misappropriated money/property; 2) coercion resulting in surrendering rights/property; 3) impersonation to obtain property/services; 4) inadequate contributions toward household expenses, but respondent still had enough money for necessities and 5) respondent was destitute and did not receive necessary assistance from family/friends.
Key results: One-year period FEOA prevalence was 2.7% (95% CI, 2.29-3.29) and lifetime prevalence was 4.7% (95% CI, 4.05-5.34). Greater relative risk (RR) of one-year period prevalence was associated with African American/black race (RR, 3.80; 95 % CI, 1.11-13.04), poverty (RR, 1.72; 95 % CI, 1.09-2.71), increasing number of non-spousal household members (RR, 1.16; 95 % CI, 1.06-1.27), and ≥ 1 instrumental activity of daily living (IADL) impairments (RR, 1.69; 95 % CI, 1.12-2.53). Greater RR of lifetime prevalence was associated with African American/black race (RR, 2.61; 95 % CI, 1.37-4.98), poverty (RR, 1.47; 95 % CI, 1.04-2.09), increasing number of non-spousal household members (RR, 1.16; 95 % CI, 1.12-1.21), and having ≥1 IADL (RR, 1.45; 95 % CI, 1.11-1.90) or ≥1 ADL (RR, 1.52; 95 % CI, 1.06-2.18) impairment. Living with a spouse/partner was associated with a significantly lower RR of lifetime prevalence (RR, 0.39; 95 % CI, 0.26-0.59) CONCLUSIONS: Financial exploitation of older adults is a common and serious problem. Elders from groups traditionally considered to be economically, medically, and sociodemographically vulnerable are more likely to self-report financial exploitation.
Comment in
-
Capsule commentary on Peterson et al., Financial exploitation of older adults: a population based prevalence study.J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Dec;29(12):1688. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2953-3. J Gen Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 25155637 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- National Research Council. Elder mistreatment: Abuse, neglect, and exploitation in an aging America. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press; 2003. - PubMed
-
- Demakis GJ. Neuropsychological evaluation of decision-making capacity in older adults. Psychol Inj Law. 2013;6(1):41–50. doi: 10.1007/s12207-013-9147-x. - DOI
-
- Roush RE, Moye JA, Mills WL, Kunik ME, Wilson NL, Taffet GE, et al. Why clinicians need to know about the elder investment fraud and financial exploitation program. Generations. 2012;36(2):94–97. - PubMed
-
- Acierno R, Hernandez MA, Amstadter AB, Resnick HS, Steve K, Muzzy W, et al. Prevalence and correlates of emotional, physical, sexual, and financial abuse and potential neglect in the United States: the National Elder Mistreatment Study. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(2):292–297. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.163089. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
