Disciplined doctors: does the sex of a doctor matter? A cross-sectional study examining the association between a doctor's sex and receiving sanctions against their medical registration
- PMID: 25104057
- PMCID: PMC4127941
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005405
Disciplined doctors: does the sex of a doctor matter? A cross-sectional study examining the association between a doctor's sex and receiving sanctions against their medical registration
Abstract
Objectives: To examine the association between doctors' sex and receiving sanctions on their medical registration, while controlling for other potentially confounding variables.
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Setting: The General Medical Council (GMC)'s List of Registered Medical Practitioners (LRMP) database of doctors practising in the UK.
Population: All doctors on the GMC's LRMP on 29 May 2013. The database included all doctors who are or have been registered to practise medicine in the UK since October 2005. The exposure of interest was doctor's sex. Confounding variables included years since primary medical qualification, world region of primary medical qualification and specialty.
Outcome measures: Sanctions on a doctor's medical registration. Sanction types included warnings, undertakings, conditions, suspension or erasure from the register. Binary logistic regression modelling, controlling for confounders, described the association between the doctor's sex and sanctions on a doctor's medical registration.
Results: Of the 329,542 doctors on the LRMP, 2697 (0.8%) had sanctions against their registration, 516 (19.1%) of whom were female. In the fully adjusted model, female doctors had nearly a third of the odds (OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.41) of having sanctions compared to male doctors. There was evidence that the association varies with specialty, with female doctors who had specialised as general practitioners being the least likely to receive sanctions compared with their male colleagues (OR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.31).
Conclusions: Female doctors have reduced odds of receiving sanctions on their medical registration when compared with their male colleagues. This association remained after adjustment for the confounding factors. These results are representative of all doctors registered to practise in the UK. Further exploration of why doctors' sex may impact their professional performance is underway.
Keywords: EPIDEMIOLOGY; GMC; Gender; LAW (see Medical Law); MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Similar articles
-
Fitness to practise sanctions in UK doctors are predicted by poor performance at MRCGP and MRCP(UK) assessments: data linkage study.BMC Med. 2018 Dec 7;16(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1214-4. BMC Med. 2018. PMID: 30522486 Free PMC article.
-
Passing MRCP (UK) PACES: a cross-sectional study examining the performance of doctors by sex and country.BMC Med Educ. 2018 Apr 6;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1178-2. BMC Med Educ. 2018. PMID: 29625566 Free PMC article.
-
Place of medical qualification and outcomes of UK General Medical Council "fitness to practise" process: cohort study.BMJ. 2011 Apr 5;342:d1817. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1817. BMJ. 2011. PMID: 21467101 Free PMC article.
-
Suicide whilst under GMC's fitness to practise investigation: Were those deaths preventable?J Forensic Leg Med. 2016 Jan;37:22-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2015.10.002. Epub 2015 Oct 22. J Forensic Leg Med. 2016. PMID: 26519926 Review.
-
Doctors' consultations with children and their parents: a model of competencies, outcomes and confounding influences.Med Educ. 2005 Aug;39(8):807-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02231.x. Med Educ. 2005. PMID: 16048623 Review.
Cited by
-
Association between hospital legal constructions and medical disputes: A multi-center analysis of 130 tertiary hospitals in Hunan Province, China.Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 7;10:993946. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.993946. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36159280 Free PMC article.
-
Fitness to practise sanctions in UK doctors are predicted by poor performance at MRCGP and MRCP(UK) assessments: data linkage study.BMC Med. 2018 Dec 7;16(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1214-4. BMC Med. 2018. PMID: 30522486 Free PMC article.
-
Engagement, not personal characteristics, was associated with the seriousness of regulatory adjudication decisions about physicians: a cross-sectional study.BMC Med. 2019 Nov 27;17(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1451-1. BMC Med. 2019. PMID: 31771585 Free PMC article.
-
Gender Differences in Demographic and Clinical Features of Physicians Admitted to a Program for Medical Professionals with Mental Disorders.Front Psychiatry. 2016 Nov 25;7:181. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00181. eCollection 2016. Front Psychiatry. 2016. PMID: 27933002 Free PMC article.
-
Empirical findings of fitness-for-duty evaluations.MedEdPublish (2016). 2018 Nov 14;7:258. doi: 10.15694/mep.2018.0000258.1. eCollection 2018. MedEdPublish (2016). 2018. PMID: 38089235 Free PMC article.
References
-
- General Medical Council. The state of medical education and practice in the UK. London: GMC, 2012
-
- Dyer C. GMC and vulnerable doctors: too blunt an instrument? BMJ 2013;347:f6230. - PubMed
-
- Elston MA. Women and medicine: the future. London: Royal College of Physicians, 2009
-
- Cardarelli R, Licciardone JC. Factors associated with high-severity disciplinary action by a state medical board: a Texas study of medical license revocation. JAOA 2006;106:153–6 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources