Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb;24(2):405-10.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0777-6. Epub 2014 Aug 10.

The German Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) is reliable, valid and responsive in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement

Affiliations

The German Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) is reliable, valid and responsive in patients undergoing hip or knee replacement

Florian D Naal et al. Qual Life Res. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the measurement properties of a German version of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis undergoing total joint replacement (TJR).

Methods: This prospective cohort study included 486 consecutive patients. The LEFS and other self-reported outcome measures were administered at different time points and several classical measurement properties were determined.

Results: The German LEFS was highly reliable (ICC 0.98) and internally consistent (CA 0.95). Construct validity was proven by large to very large correlations (r = 0.52-0.91) with all other instruments in the expected directions. Factor analysis using a polychoric correlation matrix revealed two factors at baseline and 6 months explaining about 70% of the total variance. There were no floor or ceiling effects for the total score, but significant floor effects for the single items 16-19 at baseline. The LEFS was highly responsive at 6 months.

Conclusions: The German LEFS proved to be a reliable, valid and responsive tool for the self-assessment of patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement. Nevertheless, the questionnaire seems to summarize more than one construct as highlighted by the factor analysis. Further research seems therefore warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 Jan;17(1):49-52 - PubMed
    1. Stat Med. 1998 Jan 15;17(1):101-10 - PubMed
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Apr;467(4):958-65 - PubMed
    1. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Oct;41(2):139-48 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources