Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Aug 7;20(29):10024-37.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i29.10024.

Capsule endoscopy: Present status and future expectation

Affiliations
Review

Capsule endoscopy: Present status and future expectation

Mahesh K Goenka et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Video capsule endoscopy (CE) since its introduction 13 years back, has revolutionized our approach to small intestinal diseases. Obscure gastrointestinal bleed (OGIB) continues to be the most important indication for CE with a high sensitivity, specificity as well as positive and negative predictive values. It is best performed during ongoing bleed or immediately thereafter. Overt OGIB has a higher diagnostic yield than occult OGIB. However, even in iron deficiency anemia, CE is emerging as important investigation after initial negative work up. In suspected Crohn's disease (CD), CE has been shown superior to traditional imaging and endoscopic technique and should be considered after a negative ileocolonoscopy. Although CE has also been used for evaluating established CD, a high capsule retention rate precludes its use ahead of cross-sectional imaging. Celiac disease, particularly where gastro-duodenoscopy cannot be performed or is normal, can also be investigated by CE. Small bowel tumor, hereditary polyposis syndrome, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs induced intestinal damage are other indications for CE. Capsule retention is the only significant adverse outcome of CE and occurs mostly in presence of intestinal obstruction. This can be prevented by use of Patency capsule prior to CE examination. Presence of cardiac pacemaker and intracardiac devices continue to be relative contraindications for CE, though data do not suggest interference of CE with these devices. Major limitations of CE today include failure to control its movement from outside, inability of CE to acquire tissue for diagnosis, and lack of therapeutic help. With ongoing interesting and exciting developments taking place in these areas, these issues would be solved in all probability in near future. CE has the potential to become one of the most important tools in diagnostic and possibly in the therapeutic field of gastrointestinal disorder.

Keywords: Celiac disease; Crohn’s disease; Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding; Small bowel; Small bowel tumor; Video capsule.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Components and design of capsule endoscopy system. A: Capsule; B: Schematic diagram of components of capsule; C: Data recorder; D: Patient with sensor attachment; E: Dedicated work station.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Ulcerated lesion at capsule endoscopy using chromoendoscopy. A: White light; B: Blue light (with Fuji intelligent color enhancement).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Lesions at capsule endoscopy seen in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleed. A: Arteriovenous malformation; B: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs ulcer; C: Polyp; D: Adenocarcinoma; E: Hook worm; F: Small intestinal varix.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Capsule endoscopy in patients with Crohn’s disease. A: Fissuring; B: Multiple aphthous ulcers; C: Serpiginous ulcer; D: Cobblestoning; E: Stricture.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Capsule retention at stricture. A: Stricture seen at capsule endoscopy; B: X-ray showing the retained capsule (red circle).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Agile patency capsule. A: Before disintegration; B: After disintegration.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Pillcam. A: Colonic capsule; B: Esophageal capsule.

References

    1. Iddan G, Meron G, Glukhovsky A, Swain P. Wireless capsule endoscopy. Nature. 2000;405:417. - PubMed
    1. Eliakim R, Sharma VK, Yassin K, Adler SN, Jacob H, Cave DR, Sachdev R, Mitty RD, Hartmann D, Schilling D, et al. A prospective study of the diagnostic accuracy of PillCam ESO esophageal capsule endoscopy versus conventional upper endoscopy in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux diseases. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005;39:572–578. - PubMed
    1. Lin OS, Schembre DB, Mergener K, Spaulding W, Lomah N, Ayub K, Brandabur JJ, Bredfeldt J, Drennan F, Gluck M, et al. Blinded comparison of esophageal capsule endoscopy versus conventional endoscopy for a diagnosis of Barrett’s esophagus in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:577–583. - PubMed
    1. Bhardwaj A, Hollenbeak CS, Pooran N, Mathew A. A meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of esophageal capsule endoscopy for Barrett’s esophagus in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:1533–1539. - PubMed
    1. Lu Y, Gao R, Liao Z, Hu LH, Li ZS. Meta-analysis of capsule endoscopy in patients diagnosed or suspected with esophageal varices. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:1254–1258. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources