Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Aug 11;9(8):e100173.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100173. eCollection 2014.

Extinction risks and the conservation of Madagascar's reptiles

Affiliations

Extinction risks and the conservation of Madagascar's reptiles

Richard K B Jenkins et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: An understanding of the conservation status of Madagascar's endemic reptile species is needed to underpin conservation planning and priority setting in this global biodiversity hotspot, and to complement existing information on the island's mammals, birds and amphibians. We report here on the first systematic assessment of the extinction risk of endemic and native non-marine Malagasy snakes, lizards, turtles and tortoises.

Methodology/principal findings: Species range maps from The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species were analysed to determine patterns in the distribution of threatened reptile species. These data, in addition to information on threats, were used to identify priority areas and actions for conservation. Thirty-nine percent of the data-sufficient Malagasy reptiles in our analyses are threatened with extinction. Areas in the north, west and south-east were identified as having more threatened species than expected and are therefore conservation priorities. Habitat degradation caused by wood harvesting and non-timber crops was the most pervasive threat. The direct removal of reptiles for international trade and human consumption threatened relatively few species, but were the primary threats for tortoises. Nine threatened reptile species are endemic to recently created protected areas.

Conclusions/significance: With a few alarming exceptions, the threatened endemic reptiles of Madagascar occur within the national network of protected areas, including some taxa that are only found in new protected areas. Threats to these species, however, operate inside and outside protected area boundaries. This analysis has identified priority sites for reptile conservation and completes the conservation assessment of terrestrial vertebrates in Madagascar which will facilitate conservation planning, monitoring and wise-decision making. In sharp contrast with the amphibians, there is significant reptile diversity and regional endemism in the southern and western regions of Madagascar and this study highlights the importance of these arid regions to conserving the island's biodiversity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: Two authors were employees of commercial companies (Rio Tinto and Calumma Ecological Services) at the time of manuscript preparation and submission, and they continue to be employed by these companies. This does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The 22 Critically Endangered species of Malagasy reptiles.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Spatial patterns for all reptile species included in this assessment.
A) species richness; B) richness of threatened species; C) residuals of the relationship between threatened species and total number of species (positive values were mapped in red, indicating cells that have more threatened species than expected for their richness alone, and equal or negative values in gray, indicating cells that have the same or fewer threatened species as/than expected for richness alone); D) richness of range-size rarity.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Species richness, species richness of threatened species, and range-size rarity calculated separately for five major Madagascan reptile groups.
See Materials and Methods for an explanation of the metrics used.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Major ongoing threats currently affecting Madagascar's reptiles.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Percentage of reptile species' range represented in all Madagascar Protected Areas by IUCN Red List Category.
Dotted line indicates grand mean and black short lines indicate mean percentage of range protected in each IUCN Red List Category.
Figure 6
Figure 6. Geographic distribution of the 11 species that are not represented in any protected area (i.e., gap species).

References

    1. Kiester AR (1971) Species density of North American amphibians and reptiles. Systematic Zoology 20: 127–137.
    1. Pianka ER (1972) Zoogeography and speciation of Australian desert lizards: An ecological perspective. Copeia 1972: 127–145.
    1. Buhlmann KA, Akre TSB, Iverson JB, Karapatakis D, Mittermeier RA, et al. (2009) A global analysis of tortoise and freshwater turtle distributions with identification of priority conservation areas. Chelonian Conserv Biol 8: 116–149.
    1. Schall JJ, Pianka ER (1978) Geographical trends in numbers of species. Science 201: 679–686. - PubMed
    1. Hawkins BA, Field R, Cornell HV, Currie DJ, Guégan JF, et al. (2003) Energy, water, and broad-scale geographic patterns of species richness. Ecology 84: 3105–3117.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources