Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep;35(9):1126-32.
doi: 10.1086/677636. Epub 2014 Jul 25.

Infection prevention practices in neonatal intensive care units reporting to the national healthcare safety network

Affiliations

Infection prevention practices in neonatal intensive care units reporting to the national healthcare safety network

Susan N Hocevar et al. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Patients in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are at high risk for healthcare-associated infections. Variability in reported infection rates among NICUs exists, possibly related to differences in prevention strategies. A better understanding of current prevention practices may help identify prevention gaps and areas for further research.

Methods: We surveyed infection control staff in NICUs reporting to the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) to assess strategies used to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) transmission and central line-associated bloodstream infections in NICUs.

Results: Staff from 162 of 342 NICUs responded (response rate, 47.3%). Most (92.3%) NICUs use central line insertion and maintenance bundles, but maintenance practices varied, including agents used for antisepsis and frequency of dressing changes. Forty-two percent reported routine screening for MRSA colonization upon admission for all patients. Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) use for central line care for at least 1 indication (central line insertion, dressing changes, or port/cap antisepsis) was reported in 82 NICUs (51.3%). Among sixty-five NICUs responding to questions on CHG use restrictions, 46.2% reported no restrictions.

Conclusions: Our survey illustrated heterogeneity of CLABSI and MRSA prevention practices and underscores the need for further research to define optimal strategies and evidence-based prevention recommendations for neonates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential conflicts of Interest: All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dudeck MA, Horan TC, Peterson KD, et al. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report, data summary for 2009, device-associated module. Am J Infect Control. 2011 Jun;39(5):349–367. - PubMed
    1. Lessa FC, Edwards JR, Horan TC, Morell, et al. Trends in Incidence of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infections in U.S. Neonatal Intensive Care. Units, 1998–2008. Abstr 405. Paper presented at: Fifth Decennial International Conference on Healthcare-associated Infections; 2010; Atlanta, GA.
    1. Lessa FC, Edwards JR, Fridkin SK, Tenover FC, Horan TC, Gorwitz RJ. Trends in incidence of late-onset methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in neonatal intensive care units: data from the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System, 1995–2004. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009 Jul;28(7):577–581. - PubMed
    1. Carey AJ, Duchon J, Della-Latta P, Saiman L. The epidemiology of methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a neonatal intensive care unit, 2000–2007. J Perinatol. 2010 Feb;30(2):135–139. - PubMed
    1. O’Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 May;52(9):e162–193. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms