Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification
- PMID: 25113753
- PMCID: PMC4979083
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.8800
Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification
Abstract
The purpose of this work was to modernize recommendations for evaluation, staging, and response assessment of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). A workshop was held at the 11th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma in Lugano, Switzerland, in June 2011, that included leading hematologists, oncologists, radiation oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, and nuclear medicine physicians, representing major international lymphoma clinical trials groups and cancer centers. Clinical and imaging subcommittees presented their conclusions at a subsequent workshop at the 12th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma, leading to revised criteria for staging and of the International Working Group Guidelines of 2007 for response. As a result, fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)–computed tomography (CT) was formally incorporated into standard staging for FDG-avid lymphomas. A modification of the Ann Arbor descriptive terminology will be used for anatomic distribution of disease extent, but the suffixes A or B for symptoms will only be included for HL. A bone marrow biopsy is no longer indicated for the routine staging of HL and most diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. However, regardless of stage, general practice is to treat patients based on limited (stages I and II, nonbulky) or advanced (stage III or IV) disease, with stage II bulky disease considered as limited or advanced disease based on histology and a number of prognostic factors. PET-CT will be used to assess response in FDG-avid histologies using the 5-point scale. The product of the perpendicular diameters of a single node can be used to identify progressive disease. Routine surveillance scans are discouraged. These recommendations should improve evaluation of patients with lymphoma and enhance the ability to compare outcomes of clinical trials.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
Comment in
-
Do not abandon the bone marrow biopsy yet in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr 1;33(10):1217. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.7360. Epub 2015 Feb 17. J Clin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25691675 No abstract available.
-
Value of positron emission tomography in diagnosing subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma.J Clin Oncol. 2015 Apr 1;33(10):1216-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.8193. Epub 2015 Feb 17. J Clin Oncol. 2015. PMID: 25691676 No abstract available.
-
Mediastinal Gray Zone Lymphoma with Features Intermediate between Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma and Primary Mediastinal B-Cell Lymphoma.Acta Haematol. 2016;136(3):186-90. doi: 10.1159/000448159. Epub 2016 Sep 14. Acta Haematol. 2016. PMID: 27623181
References
-
- Peters MV. A study of survival in Hodgkin's disease treated radiologically. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1950;62:299–311.
-
- Rosenberg SA, Boiron M, DeVita VT, Jr, et al. Report of the Committee on Hodgkin's Disease Staging Procedures. Cancer Res. 1971;31:1862–1863. - PubMed
-
- Carbone PP, Kaplan HS, Musshoff K, et al. Report of the Committee on Hodgkin's Disease Staging Classification. Cancer Res. 1971;31:1860–1861. - PubMed
-
- Rosenberg SA. Validity of the Ann Arbor staging classification for the non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Cancer Treat Rep. 1977;61:1023–1027. - PubMed
-
- Lister TA, Crowther D, Sutcliffe SB, et al. Report of a committee convened to discuss the evaluation and staging of patients with Hodgkin's disease: Cotswolds Meeting. J Clin Oncol. 1989;7:1630–1636. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials