Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul 17:8:1355-9.
doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S61756. eCollection 2014.

Learning curve of sutureless transconjunctival 20-gauge vitrectomy

Affiliations

Learning curve of sutureless transconjunctival 20-gauge vitrectomy

Gilbert Ws Simanjuntak et al. Clin Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Background: To report the learning curve of transition from 20-gauge (20 G) conventional vitrectomy to a 20 G sutureless vitrectomy technique.

Materials and methods: This is a retrospective descriptive case study of 32 eyes from 32 consecutive patients who underwent sutureless 20 G pars plana vitrectomy. A 20 G microvitreoretinal blade was introduced, beveled transconjunctivally, slowly, parallel with the limbus, creating a conjunctivoscleral tunnel incision. Study participants were divided into three groups, and surgical time, induced astigmatism, and complications were compared.

Results: Of 32 consecutive patients, there was no significant difference in induced astigmatism or maneuvering between the early learning curve and other groups. The true learning curve was the first three patients. There were three cases where suturing the sclerotomy was necessary: one port in each case, three of 32 cases (9.3%), or three of 96 ports (2.9%).

Conclusion: There were no significant difficulties in surgical maneuvers while performing 20 g sutureless vitrectomy.

Keywords: 20 G; learning curve; sutureless; vitrectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Time required for sclerotomy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Total surgical time in each learning-curve group. Note: *A case from group 3 where the surgical time was longer than the mean time in that group.

Similar articles

References

    1. Machemer R, Buettner H, Norton EW, Parel JM. Vitrectomy: a pars plana approach. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1971;75:813–820. - PubMed
    1. Kadonosono K, Yamakawa T, Uchio E, Yanagi Y, Tamaki Y, Araie M. Comparison of visual function after epiretinal membrane removal by 20-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142:513–515. - PubMed
    1. Yanyali A, Celik E, Horozoglu F, Oner S, Nohutcu AF. 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless pars plana vitrectomy. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2006;16:141–147. - PubMed
    1. Yanyali A, Celik E, Horozoglu F, Nohutcu AF. Corneal topographic changes after transconjunctival (25-gauge) sutureless vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;140:939–941. - PubMed
    1. Fujii GY, De Juan E, Jr, Humayun MS, et al. A new 25-gauge instrument system for transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy surgery. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:1807–1812. discussion 1813. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources