Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Aug 4:6:61-8.
doi: 10.4137/HSI.S11093. eCollection 2013.

Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)

Affiliations

Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs)

Theresa Weldring et al. Health Serv Insights. .

Abstract

In recent years, there has been an increased focus on placing patients at the center of health care research and evaluating clinical care in order to improve their experience and ensure that research is both robust and of maximum value for the use of medicinal products, therapy, or health services. This paper provides an overview of patients' involvement in clinical research and service evaluation along with its benefits and limitations. We describe and discuss patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the trends in current research. Both the patient-reported experiences measures (PREMs) and patient and public involvement (PPI) initiative for including patients in the research processes are also outlined. PROs provide reports from patients about their own health, quality of life, or functional status associated with the health care or treatment they have received. PROMs are tools and/or instruments used to report PROs. Patient report experiences through the use of PREMs, such as satisfaction scales, providing insight into the patients' experience with their care or a health service. There is increasing international attention regarding the use of PREMS as a quality indicator of patient care and safety. This reflects the ongoing health service commitment of involving patients and the public within the wider context of the development and evaluation of health care service delivery and quality improvement.

Keywords: clinical research; patient experience; patient reported measures; patient reported outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tarlov AR, Ware JE, Jr, Greenfield S, Nelson EC, Perrin E, Zubkoff M. The Medical Outcomes Study. an application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. JAMA. 1989;262(7):925–930. - PubMed
    1. Food and Drug Administration; Services DoHaH, editor. Guidance for industry patient-related outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Washington: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration; 2009. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patrick DL, Burke LB, Powers JH, et al. Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective. Value Health. 2007;10(Suppl 2):S125–S137. - PubMed
    1. Wilke RJ, Burke LB, Erickson P. Measuring treatment impact: a review of patient-reported outcomes and other efficacy endpoints in approved product labels. Control Clin Trials. 2004;25(6):535–552. - PubMed
    1. NHS Executive. Patient and public involvement in the new NHS. Leeds: Department of Health; 1999.

LinkOut - more resources