Early outcomes of arthroplasty of the first carpometacarpal joint using pyrocarbon spherical implants
- PMID: 25114617
- PMCID: PMC4116319
Early outcomes of arthroplasty of the first carpometacarpal joint using pyrocarbon spherical implants
Abstract
The first carpometacarpal joint (CMC) is the most common hand joint to develop osteoarthritis. A survey found that many hand surgeons have revisited implant arthroplasty because it preserves critical structures. However, there is currently no implant with an ideal design and material composition. The present study was the first to use and evaluate early outcomes of pyrocarbon spherical implants for arthroplasty of the first CMC in patients with Eaton-Littler stage II and III osteoarthritis. A single surgeon performed 24 arthroplasties (23 patients [20 women, three men] with a mean age of 56 years [range 46 to 75 years]) of the first CMC (nine right hands and 15 left hands) using pyrocarbon spherical implants from May 2010 to April 2013. All patients failed conservative management. At a mean (± SD) of 18.5±11.16 months postoperatively (range 4.3 to 38.9 months), the mean Kapandji score was 8.8 of 10 (range 7 to 10), the average pre- and postoperative values on the visual pain scale were 8.96±0.64 of 10 (range 8 to 10) and 1.13±1.22 of 10 (range 0 to 4), respectively. All patients were either very satisfied (score = 5) or satisfied (score = 4) with the procedure, with a mean satisfaction score of 4.76±0.44 of 5.00 (range 4 to 5). The mean postoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score was 11.79±14.29 (range 0 to 49.17). The most recent radiographic evaluations confirmed that all implants were stable with no erosion of nearby cancellous bone. There were no implant subluxations, dislocations or revisions. Early outcomes show promising results and support continued use of this implant for arthroplasty. However, longer-term follow-up will be needed to confirm these results.
La première articulation carpométacarpienne (CMC) est l’articulation de la main la plus touchée par l’arthrose. Une enquête a révélé que de nombreux chirurgiens de la main ont revu l’arthroplastie avec implant parce qu’elle en préserve les structures essentielles. La présente étude était la première à utiliser et à évaluer les résultats cliniques précoces d’implants sphériques en pyrocarbone pour l’arthroplastie de la première CMC chez des patients atteints d’arthrose de stades II et III selon la classification d’Eaton-Littler. Un seul chirurgien a effectué 24 arthroplasties de la première CMC (neuf de la main droite et 15 de la main gauche), au moyen d’implants sphériques en pyrocarbone, chez 23 patients (20 femmes, trois hommes) d’un âge moyen de 56 ans (plage de 46 à 75 ans) entre mai 2010 et avril 2013. Tous les patients ont échoué à une prise en charge prudente. Après une moyenne (± ÉT) de 18,5±11,16 mois après l’opération (plage de 4,3 à 38,9 mois), l’indice de Kapandji moyen était de 8,8 sur 10 (plage de 7 à 10), les valeurs préopératoires et postopératoires moyennes sur l’échelle visuelle de la douleur s’établissaient à 8,96±0,64 sur 10 (plage de 8 à 10) et à 1,13±1,22 sur 10 (plage de 0 à 4), respectivement. Tous les patients étaient soit très satisfaits (indice = 5) ou satisfaits (indice = 4) de l’intervention, et leur indice de satisfaction moyen s’élevait à 4,76±0,44 sur 5,00 (plage de 4 à 5). Le score DASH moyen d’incapacité du bras, de l’épaule et de la main était de 11,79±14,29 (plage de 0 à 49,17). Les évaluations radiographiques les plus récentes ont confirmé la stabilité de tous les implants, sans érosion de l’os spongieux avoisinant. Il n’y avait pas eu de subluxation, de dislocation ou de révision de l’implant. Les résultats cliniques précoces donnent des résultats prometteurs et appuient l’utilisation de cet implant en cas d’arthroplastie. Cependant, un suivi à plus long terme s’impose pour confirmer ces résultats.
Keywords: Arthroplasty; Carpometacarpal osteoarthritis; Pyrocarbon; Spherical implant.
Figures




Similar articles
-
[Short-Term Results of the Carpometacarpal Joint Arthroplasty Using the Ivory® Prosthesis].Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2018;85(2):130-136. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2018. PMID: 30295600 Czech.
-
Revision of failed trapeziometacarpal prothesis by CMI pyrocarbon implant: Retrospective study of 28 patients with a mean follow-up of 7.5 years.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Sep;107(5):102984. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102984. Epub 2021 Jun 8. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021. PMID: 34116234
-
Early Functional Outcomes and Complications of the First Carpometacarpal Arthroplasty: A Single-Institution Experience.Cureus. 2024 Oct 28;16(10):e72517. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72517. eCollection 2024 Oct. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39610574 Free PMC article.
-
Partial trapeziectomy and pyrocarbon interpositional arthroplasty for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: minimum 8-year follow-up.J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2020 Jun;45(5):472-476. doi: 10.1177/1753193420906805. Epub 2020 Feb 27. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2020. PMID: 32106759 Review.
-
[Wrist arthrodesis with a fixed-angle, "low-profile" fusion plate without carpometacarpal joint fixation].Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2017 Oct;29(5):416-430. doi: 10.1007/s00064-017-0517-5. Epub 2017 Sep 12. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2017. PMID: 28900671 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Patient-Reported Outcomes After Surgical Treatment of Early Osteoarthritis of the First Carpometacarpal Joint.Hand (N Y). 2023 Nov;18(8):1275-1283. doi: 10.1177/15589447221093669. Epub 2022 May 13. Hand (N Y). 2023. PMID: 35549562 Free PMC article.
-
Functional Outcomes for Basilar Joint Arthroplasty with Meniscus Allograft Compared with Trapeziectomy Alone.Hand (N Y). 2023 Jan;18(1):89-97. doi: 10.1177/1558944721999730. Epub 2021 Apr 1. Hand (N Y). 2023. PMID: 33789510 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic Review of Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Hemiresection Interposition Arthroplasty Materials.Hand (N Y). 2022 Sep;17(5):809-814. doi: 10.1177/1558944720974124. Epub 2020 Dec 14. Hand (N Y). 2022. PMID: 33307813 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes of Revision of Interposition Implant Trapeziometacarpal Arthroplasty.Hand (N Y). 2023 Mar;18(2_suppl):57S-64S. doi: 10.1177/15589447211028920. Epub 2021 Jul 23. Hand (N Y). 2023. PMID: 34301157 Free PMC article.
-
In vitro comparison of wear characteristics of PyroCarbon and metal on bone: Shoulder hemiarthroplasty.Shoulder Elbow. 2020 Dec;12(1 Suppl):11-22. doi: 10.1177/1758573218796837. Epub 2018 Sep 11. Shoulder Elbow. 2020. PMID: 33343712 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Martinez de Aragon JS, Moran SL, Rizzo M, Reginn KB, Beckenbaugh RD. Early outcomes of pyrolytic carbon hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of trapezial-metacarpal arthritis. J Hand Surg. 2009;34A:205–12. - PubMed
-
- Thompson JS. Surgical treatment of trapeziometacarpal arthrosis. Adv Orthop Surg. 1986:105–18.
-
- Minami A, Iwasaki N, Kutsumi K, Suenaga N, Yasuda K. A long-term follow-up of silicone-rubber interposition arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the thumb carpometacarpal joint. Hand Surg. 2005;10:77–8.2. - PubMed
-
- Woodward JF, Heller JB, Jones NF. Pyrocarbon implant hemiarthroplasty for trapeziometacarpal arthritis. Tech Hand Upper Extremity Surg. 2013;17:7–12. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous