Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014;33(3):253-65.
doi: 10.1080/10550887.2014.950029.

Randomized trial of intensive motivational interviewing for methamphetamine dependence

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomized trial of intensive motivational interviewing for methamphetamine dependence

Douglas L Polcin et al. J Addict Dis. 2014.

Abstract

An intensive, 9-session motivational interviewing (IMI) intervention was assessed using a randomized clinical trial of 217 methamphetamine (MA) dependent individuals. Intensive motivational interviewing (IMI) was compared with a single standard session of MI (SMI) combined with eight nutrition education sessions. Interventions were delivered weekly over 2 months. All study participants also received standard outpatient group treatment three times per week. Both study groups showed significant decreases in MA use and Addiction Severity Index drug scores, but there were no significant differences between the two groups. However, reductions in Addiction Severity Index psychiatric severity scores and days of psychiatric problems during the past 30 days were found for clients in the IMI group but not the SMI group. SMI may be equally beneficial to IMI in reducing MA use and problem severity, but IMI may help alleviate co-occurring psychiatric problems that are unaffected by shorter MI interventions. Additional studies are needed to assess the problems, populations, and contexts for which IMI is effective.

Keywords: Methamphetamine; motivational interviewing; psychotherapy; randomized clinical trial; treatment dose.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Recruitment and retention

References

    1. Burke BL, Arkowitz H, Menchola The efficacy of motivational interviewing: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003;71:843–861. - PubMed
    1. Hettema J, Steele J, Miller WR. Motivational interviewing. Ann Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:91–111. - PubMed
    1. Lundahl B, Burke BL. The effectiveness and applicability of motivational interviewing: a practice-friendly review of four meta-analyses. J Clin Psychol. 2009;65:1232–1245. - PubMed
    1. Heather N. The public health and brief interventions for excessive alcohol consumption: the British experience. Addict Behav. 1996;21:857–868. - PubMed
    1. Project MATCH Research Group. Matching alcoholism treatment to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. J Stud Alcohol. 1997;58:7–29. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources