Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Jan;19(1):72-9; discussion 79.
doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2608-z. Epub 2014 Aug 13.

Routine drainage of the operative bed following elective distal pancreatectomy does not reduce the occurrence of complications

Stephen W Behrman  1 , Ben L Zarzaur, Abhishek Parmar, Taylor S Riall, Bruce L Hall, Henry A Pitt
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Routine drainage of the operative bed following elective distal pancreatectomy does not reduce the occurrence of complications

Stephen W Behrman et al. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Routine drainage of the operative bed following elective pancreatectomy remains controversial. Data specific to distal pancreatectomy (DP) have not been examined in a multi-institutional collaborative.

Methods: Data from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pancreatectomy Demonstration Project were utilized. The impact of drain placement on development of pancreatectomy-related and overall morbidity were analyzed. Propensity scores for drain placement were calculated, and nearest neighbor matching was used to create a matched cohort. Groups were compared using bivariate and logistic regression analyses.

Results: Over 14 months, 761 patients undergoing DP were accrued; 606 were drained. Propensity score matching was possible in 116 patients. Drain and no drain groups were not different with respect to multiple preoperative and operative variables. All pancreatic fistulas (p < 0.01) and overall morbidity (p < 0.05) were more common in patients who received a drain. The placement of a drain did not reduce the incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula nor the need for postoperative procedures.

Conclusions: Placement of drains following elective distal pancreatectomy was associated with a higher overall morbidity and pancreatic fistulas. Drains did not reduce intra-abdominal septic morbidity, clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas, nor the need for postoperative therapeutic intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overall and Serious Morbidity in Drain and No Drain Patients
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pancreatic Fistulas in Drain and No Drain Patients
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Heider R, Meyer AA, Galanko JA, et al. Percutaneous drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts is associated with a higher failure rate than surgical treatment in unselected patients. Ann Surg. 1999;229:781–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Conlon KC, Labow D, Leung D, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection. Ann Surg. 2001;234:487–94. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kawai M, Tani M, Terasawa H, et al. Early removal of prophylactic drains reduces the risk of intra-abdominal infections in patients with pancreatic head resection: prospective study of 104 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 2006;244:1–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bassi C, Molinari E, Malleo G, et al. Early verus late drain removal after standard pancreatic resections: results of a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2010;252:207–14. - PubMed
    1. Correa-Gallego C, Brennan MF, D’Angelica M, et al. Operative drainage following pancreatic resection: analysis of 1122 patients resected over 5 years at a single institution. Ann Surg. 2013;258:1051–8. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms