Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Dec;10(4):543-9.
doi: 10.1007/s12024-014-9595-y. Epub 2014 Aug 13.

The applicability of using different energy levels in CT imaging for differentiation or identification of dental restorative materials

Affiliations
Free article
Comparative Study

The applicability of using different energy levels in CT imaging for differentiation or identification of dental restorative materials

Josef M Kutschy et al. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2014 Dec.
Free article

Abstract

Purpose: The goal of this study was to investigate whether different computed tomography (CT) energy levels could supply additional information for the differentiation of dental materials for forensic investigations.

Methods: Nine different commonly used restorative dental materials were investigated in this study. A total of 75 human third molars were filled with the restorative dental materials and then scanned using the forensic reference phantom in singlesource mode. The mean Hounsfield unit values and standard deviations (SDs) of each material were calculated at 120, 80 and 140 kVp.

Results: Most of the dental materials could be differentiated at 120 kVp. We found that greater X-ray density of a material resulted in higher SDs and that the material volume could influence the measurements.

Conclusion: Differentiation of dental materials in CT was possible in many cases using single-energy CT scans at 120 kVp. Because of the number of dental restorative materials available and scanner and scan parameter dependence, as well as the CT imaging artifacts, the identification (in contrast to differentiation) was problematic.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Forensic Sci Int. 2012 Jul 10;220(1-3):219-23 - PubMed
    1. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2012 Jul 01;30(1):1-12 - PubMed
    1. J Forensic Sci. 2006 Jan;51(1):113-9 - PubMed
    1. Int J Legal Med. 2008 Nov;122(6):471-9 - PubMed
    1. Radiographics. 2010 Jul-Aug;30(4):1037-55 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances