Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep 23;111(7):1305-9.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.448. Epub 2014 Aug 12.

The lag time in initiating clinical testing of new drugs in combination with radiation therapy, a significant barrier to progress?

Affiliations

The lag time in initiating clinical testing of new drugs in combination with radiation therapy, a significant barrier to progress?

P Blumenfeld et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: The clinical development of new drugs with radiation appears to be limited. We hypothesised that phase I clinical trials with radiation therapy (RT) are initiated too late into a new drug's lifetime, impeding the ability to complete RT-drug development programmes before patent expiration.

Methods: We identified novel drug-radiation phase I combination trials performed between 1980 and 2012 within the PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Data gathered for each drug included: date the initial phase I trial with/without RT was opened/published, date of the published positive phase III trials, and patent expiration dates. Lag time was defined as the interval between opening of the phase I trial without RT and the opening of the phase I with RT. Linear regression was used to model how the lag time has changed over time.

Results: The median lag time was 6 years. The initial phase I trial with RT was typically published 2 years after the first published positive phase III trial and 11 years before patent expiration. Using a best-fit linear model, lag time decreased from 10 years for phase I trials published in 1990 to 5 years in 2005 (slope significantly non-zero, P<0.001).

Conclusions: Clinical drug development with RT commences late in the life cycle of anti-cancer agents. Taking into account the additional time required for late-phase clinical trials, the delay in initiating clinical testing of drug-RT combinations discourages drug companies from further pursuing RT-based development. Encouragingly, lag time appears to be decreasing. Further reduction in lag time may accelerate RT-based drug development, potentially improving patient outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the process used to Identify trials for analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Typical time line of drug development with radiation. Time intervals refer to median values derived from the study of 66 drugs, as detailed in Table 2.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Lag time-P as a function of the publication year of phase I without RT.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ataman OU, Sambrook SJ, Wilks C, Lloyd A, Taylor AE, Wedge SR. The clinical development of molecularly targeted agents in combination with radiation therapy: a pharmaceutical perspective. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;84 (4:e447–e454. - PubMed
    1. Barton JH, Emanuel EJ. The patents-based pharmaceutical development process: rationale, problems, and potential reforms. JAMA. 2005;294 (16:2075–2082. - PubMed
    1. Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J, Azarnia N, Shin DM, Cohen RB, Jones CU, Sur R, Raben D, Jassem J, Ove R, Kies MS, Baselga J, Youssoufian H, Amellal N, Rowinsky EK, Ang KK. Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. 2006;354 (6:567–578. - PubMed
    1. Dickersin K, Chan S, Chalmers TC, Sacks HS, Smith HJr. Publication bias and clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1987;8 (4:343–353. - PubMed
    1. Formenti SC, Demaria S. Combining radiotherapy and cancer immunotherapy: a paradigm shift. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105 (4:256–265. - PMC - PubMed

Substances