Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec;69(12):3409-22.
doi: 10.1093/jac/dku307. Epub 2014 Aug 12.

Homogeneity of antimicrobial policy, yet heterogeneity of antimicrobial resistance: antimicrobial non-susceptibility among 108,717 clinical isolates from primary, secondary and tertiary care patients in London

Affiliations

Homogeneity of antimicrobial policy, yet heterogeneity of antimicrobial resistance: antimicrobial non-susceptibility among 108,717 clinical isolates from primary, secondary and tertiary care patients in London

Luke S P Moore et al. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: We examined the 4 year trend in antimicrobial susceptibilities and prescribing across levels of care at two London teaching hospitals and their multisite renal unit, and for the surrounding community.

Methods: Laboratory and pharmacy information management systems were interrogated, with antimicrobial use and susceptibilities analysed between hospitals, within hospitals and over time.

Results: A total of 108,717 isolates from 71,687 patients were identified, with significant differences (at P < 0.05) in antimicrobial susceptibility between and within hospitals. Across the 4 years, rates of ESBL-/AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae ranged from 6.4% to 10.7% among community isolates, 17.8% to 26.9% at ward level and 25.2% to 52.5% in critical care. Significant variations were also demonstrated in glycopeptide-resistant enterococci (ward level 6.2%-17.4%; critical care 21.9%-56.3%), MRSA (ward level 18.5%-38.2%; critical care 12.5%-47.9%) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas spp. (ward level 8.3%-16.9%; critical care 19.9%-53.7%). Few instances of persistently higher resistance were seen between the hospitals in equivalent cohorts, despite persistently higher antimicrobial use in Hospital 1 than Hospital 2. We found significant fluctuations in non-susceptibility year on year across the cohorts, but with few persistent trends.

Conclusions: The marked heterogeneity of antimicrobial susceptibilities between hospitals, within hospitals and over time demands detailed, standardized surveillance and appropriate benchmarking to identify possible drivers and effective interventions. Homogeneous antimicrobial policies are unlikely to continue to be suitable as individual hospitals join hospital networks, and policies should be tailored to local resistance rates, at least at the hospital level, and possibly with finer resolution, particularly for critical care.

Keywords: antibiograms; antimicrobial stewardship; healthcare-associated infections; multidrug-resistant organisms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(a) Proportion of Enterobacteriaceae from clinical samples displaying ESBL/AmpC resistance phenotypes among 55 600 isolates from primary, secondary and tertiary care patients in West London, 2009–13. Error bars indicate 95% CIs calculated by Wilson's method with continuity correction. (b) Proportion of Enterobacteriaceae from clinical samples resistant to ciprofloxacin among 55 600 isolates from primary, secondary and tertiary care patients in West London, 2009–13. Error bars indicate 95% CIs calculated by Wilson's method with continuity correction.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(a) Proportion of Pseudomonas spp. from clinical samples displaying ciprofloxacin non-susceptibility among 12 616 isolates from primary, secondary and tertiary care patients in West London, 2009–13. Error bars indicate 95% CIs calculated by Wilson's method with continuity correction. (b) Proportion of Pseudomonas spp. from clinical samples displaying piperacillin/tazobactam non-susceptibility among 12 616 isolates from primary, secondary and tertiary care patients in West London, 2009–13. Error bars indicate 95% CIs calculated by Wilson's method with continuity correction. (c) Proportion of Pseudomonas spp. from clinical samples displaying meropenem non-susceptibility among 12 616 isolates from primary, secondary and tertiary care patients in West London, 2009–13. Error bars indicate 95% CIs calculated by Wilson's method with continuity correction.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(a) Proportion of Pseudomonas spp. from clinical samples displaying ciprofloxacin non-susceptibility among 12 616 isolates from primary, secondary and tertiary care patients in West London, 2009–13. Error bars indicate 95% CIs calculated by Wilson's method with continuity correction. (b) Proportion of Pseudomonas spp. from clinical samples displaying piperacillin/tazobactam non-susceptibility among 12 616 isolates from primary, secondary and tertiary care patients in West London, 2009–13. Error bars indicate 95% CIs calculated by Wilson's method with continuity correction. (c) Proportion of Pseudomonas spp. from clinical samples displaying meropenem non-susceptibility among 12 616 isolates from primary, secondary and tertiary care patients in West London, 2009–13. Error bars indicate 95% CIs calculated by Wilson's method with continuity correction.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
(a) Proportion of enterococci from clinical samples displaying glycopeptide non-susceptibility among 13 643 isolates from primary, secondary and tertiary care patients in West London, 2009–13. Error bars indicate 95% CIs calculated by Wilson's method with continuity correction. (b) Proportion of enterococci from clinical samples displaying amoxicillin non-susceptibility among 13 643 isolates from primary, secondary and tertiary care patients in West London, 2009–13. Error bars indicate 95% CIs calculated by Wilson's method with continuity correction.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Proportion of S. aureus from clinical samples displaying methicillin non-susceptibility among 26 858 isolates from primary, secondary and tertiary care patients in West London, 2009–13. Error bars indicate 95% CIs calculated by Wilson's method with continuity correction.

References

    1. ECDC. Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance in Europe 2011. http://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/publications/antimicrobial-res... .
    1. Lamoth F, Wenger A, Prod'hom G, et al. Comparison of hospital-wide and unit-specific cumulative antibiograms in hospital- and community-acquired infection. Infection. 2010;38:249–53. - PubMed
    1. Azim A, Dwivedi M, Rao PB, et al. Epidemiology of bacterial colonization at intensive care unit admission with emphasis on extended-spectrum β-lactamase- and metallo-β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria—an Indian experience. J Med Microbiol. 2010;59:955–60. - PubMed
    1. Verhamme KMC, De Coster W, De Roo L, et al. Pathogens in early-onset and late-onset intensive care unit-acquired pneumonia. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007;28:389–97. - PubMed
    1. Reynolds R, Maher K, Hope R on behalf of BSAC Working Party on Resistance Surveillance. ICU—always the hotbed of resistance? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17(Suppl S4):S333 (P1231).

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances