Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Aug 13;9(8):e102446.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102446. eCollection 2014.

The prevalence of workaholism: a survey study in a nationally representative sample of Norwegian employees

Affiliations

The prevalence of workaholism: a survey study in a nationally representative sample of Norwegian employees

Cecilie Schou Andreassen et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Workaholism has become an increasingly popular area for empirical study. However, most studies examining the prevalence of workaholism have used non-representative samples and measures with poorly defined cut-off scores. To overcome these methodological limitations, a nationally representative survey among employees in Norway (N = 1,124) was conducted. Questions relating to gender, age, marital status, caretaker responsibility for children, percentage of full-time equivalent, and educational level were asked. Workaholism was assessed by the use of a psychometrically validated instrument (i.e., Bergen Work Addiction Scale). Personality was assessed using the Mini-International Personality Item Pool. Results showed that the prevalence of workaholism was 8.3% (95% CI = 6.7-9.9%). An adjusted logistic regression analysis showed that workaholism was negatively related to age and positively related to the personality dimensions agreeableness, neuroticism, and intellect/imagination. Implications for these findings are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Oates W (1971) Confessions of a workaholic: The facts about work addiction. New York: World.
    1. Taris TW, Schaufeli W, Shimazu A (2010) The push and pull of work: The difference between workaholism and work engagement. In: Bakker AB, Leiter MP, editors.Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research.Hove: Pscyhological Press. pp. 39–53.
    1. Andreassen CS, Hetland J, Pallesen S (2014) Psychometric assessment of workaholism measures. Journal of Managerial Psychology 29: 7–24.
    1. Machlowitz M (1980) Workaholics: Living with them, working with them. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    1. Scott KS, Moore KS, Miceli MP (1997) An exploration of the meaning and consequences of workaholism. Human Relations 50: 287–314.

LinkOut - more resources