Chlamydia screening for sexually active young women under the Affordable Care Act: new opportunities and lingering barriers
- PMID: 25118966
- PMCID: PMC6820345
- DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000170
Chlamydia screening for sexually active young women under the Affordable Care Act: new opportunities and lingering barriers
Abstract
The Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) contains a provision requiring private insurers issuing or renewing plans on or after September 23, 2010, to provide, without cost sharing, preventive services recommended by US Preventive Services Task Force (grades A and B), among other recommending bodies. As a grade A recommendation, chlamydia screening for sexually active young women 24 years and younger and older women at risk for chlamydia falls under this requirement. This article examines the potential effect on chlamydia screening among this population across private and public health plans and identifies lingering barriers not addressed by this legislation. Examination of the impact on women with private insurance touches upon the distinction between coverage under grandfathered plans, where the requirement does not apply, and nongrandfathered plans, where the requirement does apply. Acquisition of private health insurance through health insurance Marketplaces is also discussed. For public health plans, coverage of preventive services without cost sharing differs for individuals enrolled in standard Medicaid, covered under the Medicaid expansion included in the ACA, or those enrolled under the Children's Health Insurance Program or who fall under Early, Periodic, Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment criteria. The discussion of lingering barriers not addressed by the ACA includes the uninsured, physician reimbursement, cost sharing, confidentiality, low rates of appropriate sexual history taking by providers, and disclosures of sensitive information. In addition, the role of safety net programs that provide health care to individuals regardless of ability to pay is examined in light of the expectation that they also remain a payer of last resort.
Conflict of interest statement
No conflict of interest exists.
Similar articles
-
The Association between Insurance Status and Acceptance of Chlamydia Screening By Teenagers Who Present for Preventive Care Visits.J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016 Feb;29(1):62-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jun 19. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 26099698
-
Patterns of Health Insurance Coverage Around the Time of Pregnancy Among Women with Live-Born Infants--Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 29 States, 2009.MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Jun 19;64(4):1-19. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015. PMID: 26086743 Free PMC article.
-
Health plan implementation of U.S. Preventive Services Task Force A and B recommendations--Colorado, 2010.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 Oct 7;60(39):1348-50. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011. PMID: 21976117
-
A Critical Analysis of Obamacare: Affordable Care or Insurance for Many and Coverage for Few?Pain Physician. 2017 Mar;20(3):111-138. Pain Physician. 2017. PMID: 28339427 Review.
-
Factors affecting women's access to primary care in the United States since the Affordable Care Act: A mixed-methods systematic review.PLoS One. 2024 Dec 19;19(12):e0314620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314620. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39700208 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Improving STD Screening Rates on a University Campus.J Community Health. 2017 Dec;42(6):1247-1254. doi: 10.1007/s10900-017-0377-9. J Community Health. 2017. PMID: 28589269
-
Missed Opportunities for Chlamydia Screening in Title X Family Planning Clinics.Sex Transm Dis. 2017 Sep;44(9):519-523. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000641. Sex Transm Dis. 2017. PMID: 28809768 Free PMC article.
-
Creating Innovative Sexually Transmitted Infection Testing Options for University Students: The Impact of an STI Self-testing Program.Sex Transm Dis. 2018 Apr;45(4):272-277. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000733. Sex Transm Dis. 2018. PMID: 29528987 Free PMC article.
-
Sexually Transmitted Disease Prevention Policies in the United States: Evidence and Opportunities.Sex Transm Dis. 2016 Feb;43(2 Suppl 1):S113-21. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000289. Sex Transm Dis. 2016. PMID: 26779683 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Satterwhite C, Torrone E, Meites E, et al. Sexually transmitted infections among US women and men: prevalence and incidence estimates, 2008. Sex Transm Dis. 2013;40:187–196. - PubMed
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2011. Atlanta, USA: Department of Health and Human Services; 2012.
-
- Forhan SE, Gottlieb SL, Sternberg MR, et al. Prevalence of sexually transmitted infections among female adolescents aged 14 to 19 in the United States. Pediatrics. 2009;124:1505–1512. - PubMed
-
- Steele CB, Richmond-Reese V, Lomax S. Racial and ethnic disparities in HIV/AIDS, sexually transmitted diseases, and tuberculosis among women. J Womens Health. 2006;15:116–122. - PubMed
-
- Datta SD, Sternberg M, Johnson RE, et al. Gonorrhea and chlamydia in the United States among persons 14 to 39 years of age, 1999 to 2002. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:89–96. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials