Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1989 Sep;8(9):838-42.
doi: 10.1007/BF02185857.

Importance of blood volume cultured in the detection of bacteremia

Affiliations

Importance of blood volume cultured in the detection of bacteremia

M Arpi et al. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 Sep.

Abstract

The influence of the volume of blood cultured on the rate of detection of bacteremia was evaluated in a routine 12-tube blood culture system using 1693 samples from 1502 patients. Blood samples were drawn simultaneously into two transport tubes. The blood volume cultured was the only varying parameter. Generally, 17% more cultures with clinically significant microorganisms (both Enterobacteriaceae and gram-positive cocci) were found when blood from two instead of one tube was used (in most cases comparing 13-16 ml of blood with 6.5-8 ml). Of the most prevalent species, the maximum average extra yield was observed for Staphylococcus aureus (26%) followed by Escherichia coli (16%) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (12%). In adults most cases of bacteremia are low-grade. The grade of bacteremia in our patient population was on average as low as 0.25 CFU/ml blood. Therefore, all patients suspected of having bacteremia should have the benefit of a sufficient volume of blood cultured. Since the volume of blood cultured seems to be the single most important factor in the detection of bacteremia, it is imperative that the volume is the same in comparative studies of different blood culture systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Pediatr. 1978 May;92(5):778-80 - PubMed
    1. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B. 1985 Feb;93(1):1-6 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1983 May;17(5):864-9 - PubMed
    1. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B. 1982 Aug;90(4):309-17 - PubMed
    1. Am J Med. 1980 Mar;68(3):332-43 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources