Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct;52(10):3755-62.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.01409-14. Epub 2014 Aug 13.

Collection and characterization of samples for establishment of a serum repository for lyme disease diagnostic test development and evaluation

Affiliations

Collection and characterization of samples for establishment of a serum repository for lyme disease diagnostic test development and evaluation

Claudia R Molins et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Oct.

Abstract

Serological assays and a two-tiered test algorithm are recommended for laboratory confirmation of Lyme disease. In the United States, the sensitivity of two-tiered testing using commercially available serology-based assays is dependent on the stage of infection and ranges from 30% in the early localized disease stage to near 100% in late-stage disease. Other variables, including subjectivity in reading Western blots, compliance with two-tiered recommendations, use of different first- and second-tier test combinations, and use of different test samples, all contribute to variation in two-tiered test performance. The availability and use of sample sets from well-characterized Lyme disease patients and controls are needed to better assess the performance of existing tests and for development of improved assays. To address this need, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institutes of Health prospectively collected sera from patients at all stages of Lyme disease, as well as healthy donors and patients with look-alike diseases. Patients and healthy controls were recruited using strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Samples from all included patients were retrospectively characterized by two-tiered testing. The results from two-tiered testing corroborated the need for novel and improved diagnostics, particularly for laboratory diagnosis of earlier stages of infection. Furthermore, the two-tiered results provide a baseline with samples from well-characterized patients that can be used in comparing the sensitivity and specificity of novel diagnostics. Panels of sera and accompanying clinical and laboratory testing results are now available to Lyme disease serological test users and researchers developing novel tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aguero-Rosenfeld ME, Wang G, Schwartz I, Wormser GP. 2005. Diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 18:484–509. 10.1128/CMR.18.3.484-509.2005 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stanek G, Wormser GP, Gray J, Strle F. 2012. Lyme borreliosis. Lancet 379:461–473. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60103-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aguero-Rosenfeld ME. 2008. Lyme disease: laboratory issues. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am. 22:301–313. 10.1016/j.idc.2007.12.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 1995. Recommendations for test performance and interpretation from the Second National Conference on Serologic Diagnosis of Lyme Disease. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 44:590–591 - PubMed
    1. Feder HM, Johnson BJ, O'Connell S, Shapiro ED, Steere AC, Wormser GP, Agger WA, Artsob H, Auwaerter P, Dumler JS, Bakken JS, Bockenstedt LK, Green J, Dattwyler RJ, Munoz J, Nadelman RB, Schwartz I, Draper T, Mcsweegan E, Halperin JJ, Klempner MS, Krause PJ, Mead P, Morshed M, Porwancher R, Radolf JD, Smith RP, Jr, Sood S, Weinstein A, Wong SJ, Zemel L. 2007. A critical appraisal of “chronic Lyme disease.” N. Engl. J. Med. 357:1422–1430. 10.1056/NEJMra072023 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types