Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep;62(9):1666-74.
doi: 10.1111/jgs.12988. Epub 2014 Aug 14.

Effect of Part D coverage restrictions for antidepressants, antipsychotics, and cholinesterase inhibitors on related nursing home resident outcomes

Affiliations

Effect of Part D coverage restrictions for antidepressants, antipsychotics, and cholinesterase inhibitors on related nursing home resident outcomes

David G Stevenson et al. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: In 2006, Medicare Part D transitioned prescription drug coverage for dual-eligible nursing home residents from Medicaid to Medicare and randomly assigned them to Part D prescription drug plans (PDPs). Because PDPs may differ in coverage, plans may be more or less generous for drugs that an individual is taking. Taking advantage of the fact that randomization mitigates potential selection bias common in observational studies, this study sought to assess the effect of PDP coverage on resident outcomes for three medication classes--antidepressants, antipsychotics, and cholinesterase inhibitors.

Design: Retrospective cohort study to examine the effect of coverage restrictions--including noncoverage and coverage with restrictions--on depression, hallucinations and delusions, aggressive behaviors, cognitive performance, and activities of daily living for dual-eligible nursing home residents randomized to PDPs in 2006 to 2008. The analyses further adjusted for baseline health status to address any residual imbalances in the comparison groups.

Setting: Linked data from Medicare claims, Minimum Data Set assessments, pharmacy claims, and PDP formulary information.

Participants: Dual-eligible nursing home residents aged 65 and older living in facilities that contracted with a single pharmacy provider.

Results: PDP coverage restrictions in three medication classes of interest were not significantly associated with the resident outcomes examined. Although cholinesterase inhibitor users facing coverage restrictions had a 0.04-point lower depression rating score than residents facing no restrictions, this difference was not statistically significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that exogenous changes in coverage for three commonly used medication classes had no detectable effect on nursing home resident outcomes in 2006 to 2008. There are several possible explanations for this lack of association, including the role of policy protections for dual-eligible nursing home residents and the possibility that suitable clinical alternatives were identified or that previously used medications offered little clinical benefit.

Keywords: Medicare Part D; coverage restrictions; nursing home.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

J.P.N. is the director of and holds equity in Aetna, which sells Part D plans. B.J.Z. is an employee of Omnicare Inc., and holds Omnicare Inc., stock. She participates in research projects funded by grants from Amgen, Sanofi-Aventis, Mylan, AbbVie, Astellas, and Optimer. M.E.C. reports the following potential conflicts: Research support: CareFirst, NIA, The Commonwealth Fund, Charles H. Hood Foundation, InHealth, Institute of Medicine, Pfizer Inc., Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; Board memberships: Commonwealth Fund Commission of High Performance, Congressional Budget Office, Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, Abbott, FairHealth, Health Research & Educational Trust, National Institute of Health Care Management, CMS Technical Advisory Panel, NC Prevention Partner Advisory Council on Evidence-based Incentives and Benefits, and Massachusetts Medical Society; Consultancy: Massachusetts Medical Society, America’s Health Insurance Plans, Abbott, Humana, SEIU, Precision Health Economics, US Chamber of Commerce, and Milliman; LLC Equity: Benefit Based Designs, Value Based Insurance Design Institute, and Value Based Insurance Design Health; Payment for Manuscript Prep/development: Truven Healthcare Analytics, Precision Health Economics, New America Foundation, and London School of Economics; Role as Journal Editor: Health Services Research and American Journal of Managed Care. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1a: Antidepressant Medication Use Behavior by Presence of Coverage Restrictions among Dual-Eligible Nursing Home Residents, 2006–2008. Figure 1b: Antipsychotic Medication Use Behavior by Presence of Coverage Restrictions among Dual-Eligible Nursing Home Residents, 2006–2008. Figure 1c: Cholinesterase Inhibitor Medication Use Behavior by Presence of Coverage Restrictions among Dual-Eligible Nursing Home Residents, 2006–2008.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1a: Antidepressant Medication Use Behavior by Presence of Coverage Restrictions among Dual-Eligible Nursing Home Residents, 2006–2008. Figure 1b: Antipsychotic Medication Use Behavior by Presence of Coverage Restrictions among Dual-Eligible Nursing Home Residents, 2006–2008. Figure 1c: Cholinesterase Inhibitor Medication Use Behavior by Presence of Coverage Restrictions among Dual-Eligible Nursing Home Residents, 2006–2008.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1a: Antidepressant Medication Use Behavior by Presence of Coverage Restrictions among Dual-Eligible Nursing Home Residents, 2006–2008. Figure 1b: Antipsychotic Medication Use Behavior by Presence of Coverage Restrictions among Dual-Eligible Nursing Home Residents, 2006–2008. Figure 1c: Cholinesterase Inhibitor Medication Use Behavior by Presence of Coverage Restrictions among Dual-Eligible Nursing Home Residents, 2006–2008.

References

    1. Stevenson DG, Huskamp HA, Keating NL, et al. Medicare Part D and nursing home residents. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2007;55:1115–1125. - PubMed
    1. Stevenson DG, Huskamp HA, Newhouse JP. Medicare part D and the nursing home setting. Gerontologist. 2008;48:432–441. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stevenson DG, Newhouse JP, Huskamp HA. Medicare Part D, Nursing Homes, and Long-Term Care Pharmacies. Washington, DC: Medicare Payment Advisory Commission; 2007. ( http://www.medpac.gov/documents/Jun07_Part_D_contractor.pdf)
    1. Huskamp HA, Stevenson DG, O’Malley AJ, et al. Medicare Part D plan generosity and medication use among dual-eligible nursing home residents. Med Care. 2013;51:894–900. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goldman DP, Joyce GF, Escarce JJ, et al. Pharmacy benefits and the use of drugs by the chronically ill. JAMA. 2004;291:2344–2350. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms