Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Oct;16(10):406.
doi: 10.1007/s11912-014-0406-0.

Cancer-promoting effects of microbial dysbiosis

Affiliations
Review

Cancer-promoting effects of microbial dysbiosis

Amy M Sheflin et al. Curr Oncol Rep. 2014 Oct.

Abstract

Humans depend on our commensal bacteria for nutritive, immune-modulating, and metabolic contributions to maintenance of health. However, this commensal community exists in careful balance that, if disrupted, enters dysbiosis; this has been shown to contribute to the pathogenesis of colon, gastric, esophageal, pancreatic, laryngeal, breast, and gallbladder carcinomas. This development is closely tied to host inflammation, which causes and is aggravated by microbial dysbiosis and increases vulnerability to pathogens. Advances in sequencing technology have increased our ability to catalog microbial species associated with various cancer types across the body. However, defining microbial biomarkers as cancer predictors presents multiple challenges, and existing studies identifying cancer-associated bacteria have reported inconsistent outcomes. Combining metabolites and microbiome analyses can help elucidate interactions between gut microbiota, metabolism, and the host. Ultimately, understanding how gut dysbiosis impacts host response and inflammation will be critical to creating an accurate picture of the role of the microbiome in cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines: Conflict of Interest: Amy M. Sheflin, Alyssa K. Whitney, and Tiffany L. Weir declare that they have no conflict of interest

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The progression of the gut microbial community from a state of balance (eubiosis) to imbalance (dysbiosis) is associated with physiologic, metabolic and cellular responses in the host that modulate cancer risk.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Thomas LV, Ockhuizen T. New insights into the impact of the intestinal microbiota on health and disease: a symposium report. British Journal of Nutrition. 2012;107(S1):S1–S13. - PubMed
    1. Consortium HMP. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature. 2012;486(7402):207–214. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yang Y, Wang X, Huycke T, Moore DR, Lightfoot SA, Huycke MM. Colon Macrophages Polarized by Commensal Bacteria Cause Colitis and Cancer through the Bystander Effect. Translational Oncology. 2013;6(5):596. This study demonstrates that specific human commensals can polarize macrophages to the M1 phenotype, which then serve as effectors for bacterial induced bystander effects. They propose targeting M1 macrophages as a chemopreventive strategy. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Candela M, Turroni S, Biagi E, Carbonero F, Rampelli S, Fiorentini C, Brigidi P. Inflammation and colorectal cancer, when microbiota-host mutualism breaks. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(4):908–922. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jobin C. Colorectal cancer: looking for answers in the microbiota. Cancer discovery. 2013;3(4):384–387. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms