Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Sep;261(1):23-49.
doi: 10.1111/imr.12208.

Transcriptional and epigenetic networks of helper T and innate lymphoid cells

Affiliations
Review

Transcriptional and epigenetic networks of helper T and innate lymphoid cells

Han-Yu Shih et al. Immunol Rev. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

The discovery of the specification of CD4(+) helper T cells to discrete effector 'lineages' represented a watershed event in conceptualizing mechanisms of host defense and immunoregulation. However, our appreciation for the actual complexity of helper T-cell subsets continues unabated. Just as the Sami language of Scandinavia has 1000 different words for reindeer, immunologists recognize the range of fates available for a CD4(+) T cell is numerous and may be underestimated. Added to the crowded scene for helper T-cell subsets is the continuously growing family of innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), endowed with common effector responses and the previously defined 'master regulators' for CD4(+) helper T-cell subsets are also shared by ILC subsets. Within the context of this extraordinary complexity are concomitant advances in the understanding of transcriptomes and epigenomes. So what do terms like 'lineage commitment' and helper T-cell 'specification' mean in the early 21st century? How do we put all of this together in a coherent conceptual framework? It would be arrogant to assume that we have a sophisticated enough understanding to seriously answer these questions. Instead, we review the current status of the flexibility of helper T-cell responses in relation to their genetic regulatory networks and epigenetic landscapes. Recent data have provided major surprises as to what master regulators can or cannot do, how they interact with other transcription factors and impact global genome-wide changes, and how all these factors come together to influence helper cell function.

Keywords: ILCs; T cells; cell identity; epigenetics; gene regulation; transcription factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 3

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Miller JF, Mitchell GF. The thymus and the precursors of antigen reactive cells. Nature. 1967;216:659–663. - PubMed
    1. Mitchell GF, Miller JF. Immunological activity of thymus and thoracic-duct lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1968;59:296–303. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cantor H, Boyse EA. Functional subclasses of T-lymphocytes bearing different Ly antigens. I. The generation of functionally distinct T-cell subclasses is a differentiative process independent of antigen. J Exp Med. 1975;141:1376–1389. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kisielow P, Hirst JA, Shiku H, Beverley PC, Hoffman MK, Boyse EA, Oettgen HF. Ly antigens as markers for functionally distinct subpopulations of thymus-derived lymphocytes of the mouse. Nature. 1975;253:219–220. - PubMed
    1. Shiku H, Kisielow P, Bean MA, Takahashi T, Boyse EA, Oettgen HF, Old LJ. Expression of T-cell differentiation antigens on effector cells in cell-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro. Evidence for functional heterogeneity related to the surface phenotype of T cells. J Exp Med. 1975;141:227–241. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types