A randomized comparative trial of two decision tools for pregnant women with prior cesareans
- PMID: 25123822
- PMCID: PMC12961758
- DOI: 10.1111/1552-6909.12485
A randomized comparative trial of two decision tools for pregnant women with prior cesareans
Abstract
Objective: Evaluate tools to help pregnant women with prior cesareans make informed decisions about having trials of labor.
Design: Randomized comparative trial.
Setting: A research assistant with a laptop met the women in quiet locations at clinics and at health fairs.
Participants: Pregnant women (N = 131) who had one prior cesarean and were eligible for vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) participated one time between 2005 and 2007.
Methods: Women were randomized to receive either an evidence-based, interactive decision aid or two evidence-based educational brochures about cesarean delivery and VBAC. Effect on the decision-making process was assessed before and after the interventions.
Results: Compared to baseline, women in both groups felt more informed (F = 23.8, p < .001), were more clear about their birth priorities (F = 9.7, p = .002), felt more supported (F = 9.8, p = .002, and overall reported less conflict (F = 18.1, p < 0.001) after receiving either intervention. Women in their third trimesters reported greater clarity around birth priorities after using the interactive decision aid than women given brochures (F = 9.8, p = .003).
Conclusion: Although both decision tools significantly reduced conflict around the birth decision compared to baseline, more work is needed to understand which format, the interactive decision aid or paper brochures, are more effective early and late in pregnancy.
Keywords: VBAC; decision aid; decision support techniques; pregnancy; women's preferences.
© 2014 AWHONN, the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses.
Figures
References
-
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). (2005). Cesarean birth: woman education pamphlet. Washington DC: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, ISSN 1074–8602.
-
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). (1999). Vaginal birth after cesarean: woman education pamphlet. Washington DC: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, ISSN 1074–8601.
-
- Cunningham FG, Bangdiwala S, Brown SS, Dean TM, Frederiksen M, Rowland Hogue CJ,… Zimmet SC (2010). National Institutes of Health consensus development conference statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 115(6), 1279–1295. - PubMed
-
- DiMaio H, Edwards RK, Euliano TY, Treloar RW, & Cruz AC (2002). Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: An historic cohort cost analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 186(5), 890–892. - PubMed
-
- Dolan JG, & Frisina S (2002). Randomized controlled trial of a woman decision aid for colorectal cancer screening. Medical Decision Making, 22(2), 125–139. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
