Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Nov;23(6):473-8.
doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051822. Epub 2014 Aug 13.

Quantifying the influence of the tobacco industry on EU governance: automated content analysis of the EU Tobacco Products Directive

Affiliations

Quantifying the influence of the tobacco industry on EU governance: automated content analysis of the EU Tobacco Products Directive

Hélia Costa et al. Tob Control. 2014 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: The tobacco industry spends large sums lobbying the European Union (EU) institutions, yet whether such lobbying significantly affects tobacco policy is not well understood. We used novel quantitative text mining techniques to evaluate the impact of industry pressure on the contested EU Tobacco Products Directive revision.

Design: Policy positions of 18 stakeholders including the tobacco industry, health NGOs and tobacco retailers were evaluated using their text submissions to EU consultations and impact assessments. Using Wordscores to calculate word frequencies, we developed a scale ranging from 0-tobacco industry to 1-public health organisations, which was then used to track changes in the policy position of the European Commission's 2010 consultation document, its 2012 final proposal and the European Parliament and Council's approved legislation in March 2014.

Results: Several stakeholders' positions were closer to the tobacco industry than that of health NGOs, including retailers (ω=0.35), trade unions (ω=0.34) and publishers (ω=0.33 and ω=0.40). Over time the European Commission's position shifted towards the tobacco industry from ω=0.52 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.54) to ω=0.40 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.42). This transition reflected an increasing use of words pertaining to business and the economy in the Commission's document. Our findings were robust to alternative methods of scoring policy positions in EU documents.

Conclusions: Using quantitative text mining techniques, we observed that tobacco industry lobbying activity at the EU was associated with significant policy shifts in the EU Tobacco Products Directive legislation towards the tobacco industry's submissions. In the light of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, additional governance strategies are needed to prevent undue influence of the tobacco industry on EU policy making.

Keywords: Public Policy; Tobacco Industry; Tobacco Industry Documents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
European Union (EU) Tobacco Products Directive Timeline. Documents used to measure the EU's position boxed. Timing of documents used in analysis and set out in table 1 is shown in dotted lines.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Estimated changes in European Union Policy positions. Word scores estimated in STATA, using tobacco industry and health organisation documents as reference texts. Raw wordscores were rescaled using the Martin-Vanberg transformation (see equation 2). 95% CIs depicted in black bars.

Comment in

References

    1. European Parliament. European Parliament legislative resolution of 26 February 2014 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products (COM(2012)0788—C7-0420/2012–2012/0366(COD)). 2014.
    1. European Commission. Press statement on behalf of the European Commission. 2012.
    1. Tobacco Tactics. TPD: Burglaries.
    1. Corporate European Observatory. Tobacco lobbyists all fired up ahead of key vote 2013.
    1. Savell E, Gilmore AB, Fooks G. How does the tobacco industry attempt to influence marketing regulations? a systematic review. PLoS ONE 2014;9:e87389. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types