Comparative evaluation of a novel smart-seal obturating system and its homogeneity of using cone beam computed tomography: In vitro simulated lateral canal study
- PMID: 25125851
- PMCID: PMC4127697
- DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.136512
Comparative evaluation of a novel smart-seal obturating system and its homogeneity of using cone beam computed tomography: In vitro simulated lateral canal study
Abstract
Aim: The aim was to evaluate and compare a novel polyamide polymer based obturating system and Gutta-percha and sealer in filling simulated lateral canals and their homogeneity when used for obturating the root canals.
Materials and methods: A total of 60 freshly extracted human single rooted teeth with fully formed apices were selected for this study. Teeth were de-coronated, and roots were standardized to a working length of 15 mm. Root canal preparation was carried out with rotary Protaper file system in all groups. The specimens were then randomly divided into three groups A, B, and C (n = 20). Ten samples from each group were decalcified and simulated lateral canals were made at 2, 4, and 6 mm from the root apex. Remaining ten samples from each group were maintained calcified. Group A was obturated with SmartSeal system (Prosmart-DRFP Ltd., Stamford, UK). Group B was obturated with sectional backfill method. Group C was obutrated with cold lateral compaction method (control). Decalcified samples from the respective groups were analyzed with digital radiography and photography and the measurement of the linear extension and area of lateral canal filling was done using UTHSCSA (UTHSCSA Image Tool for Windows version 3.0, San Antonio, TX, USA) software. Calcified samples were subjected to cone beam computed tomography image analysis sectioned axially.
Results: Group A 92.46 ± 19.45 showed greatest extent of filling in lateral canals and denser homogeneity of oburation, followed by Group B 78.43 ± 26.45 and Group C 52.12 ± 36.67.
Conclusions: Polyamide polymer obturation proved to have greater efficiency when compared with Gutta-percha system, when used for obturation with regards to adaptation of the sealer and penetration into the simulated lateral canals.
Keywords: Cone beam computed tomography; Gutta-percha; SmartSeal system; polyamide polymer.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Johnson WT, Kulild JC. Obturation of the cleaned and shaped root canal system. In: Hargreaves KM, Cohen S, editors. Pathways of the Pulp. 10th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2011. pp. 324–58.
-
- Weller RN, Kimbrough WF, Anderson RW. A comparison of thermoplastic obturation techniques: Adaptation to the canal walls. J Endod. 1997;23:703–6. - PubMed
-
- Tanomaru-Filho M, Silveira GF, Tanomaru JM, Bier CA. Evaluation of the thermoplasticity of different Gutta-percha cones and Resilon. Aust Endod J. 2007;33:23–6. - PubMed
-
- Karabucak B, Kim A, Chen V, Iqbal MK. The comparison of Gutta-percha and Resilon penetration into lateral canals with different thermoplastic delivery systems. J Endod. 2008;34:847–9. - PubMed
-
- Venturi M, Di Lenarda R, Prati C, Breschi L. An in vitro model to investigate filling of lateral canals. J Endod. 2005;31:877–81. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
