Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Aug 15:14:852.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-852.

Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of preventive zinc supplementation

Affiliations

Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of preventive zinc supplementation

Günther Fink et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Even though the WHO currently recommends zinc for diarrhea management, no consensus has been reached with respect to routine distribution of zinc for preventive reasons. We reviewed the health impact of preventive zinc interventions, and evaluated the relative cost effectiveness of currently feasible interventions.

Methods: Using the latest relative risk estimates reported in the literature, we parameterized a health impact model, and calculated the expected benefits of zinc supplementation in a representative low-income country. We then computed the cost and cost-effectiveness for three delivery mechanisms: the direct distribution of zinc supplements, the distribution of micronutrient biscuits including zinc, and the distribution of zinc through water filtration systems.

Results: Combining all health outcomes and impact estimates, we find that systematic zinc supplementation among children of ages one to five would avert 1.423 DALYs per 100 households and year in least developed countries. The estimated cost per DALY is US$ 606 for pill supplementation, US$ 1211 for micronutrient biscuits, and US$ 879 per DALY saved for water filtration systems.

Conclusions: Preventive zinc supplementation to children of ages 1-5 appears to be a highly cost-effective intervention in typical developing country settings. More research will be needed to determine the most effective mechanism to deliver zinc to this target population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sensitivity analysis. a: Tornado Chart for Supplementation and Biscuits. b: Tornado Chart for Water System and Water Filter.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hess SY, Lönnerdal B, Hotz C, Rivera JA, Brown KH. Recent advances in knowledge of zinc nutrition and human health. In: Brown KH, Hess SY, editors. International Zinc Nutrition Consultative Group Technical Document No 2 Systematic reviews of zinc intervention strategies. 2009. - PubMed
    1. IZiNCG Assessment of the risk of zinc deficiency in populations and options for its control. Food Nutr Bull. 2004;25:91–204. - PubMed
    1. Caulfield L, Black R. Zinc deficiency. In: Ezzati M, Lopez A, Rodgers A, Murray C, editors. Comparative quantification of health risks: Global and regional burden of disease attributable to select major risk factors. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004.
    1. WHO . Clinical management of acute diarrhoea. Geneva/New York: World Health Organization/UNICEF; 2004.
    1. WHO . Implementing the new recommendations of the clinical management of diarrhoea. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.
Pre-publication history
    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/852/prepub

Publication types