Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Nov;90(5):496-501.
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.006. Epub 2014 Jul 22.

Change in abortion services after implementation of a restrictive law in Texas

Daniel Grossman  1 , Sarah Baum  2 , Liza Fuentes  2 , Kari White  3 , Kristine Hopkins  4 , Amanda Stevenson  4 , Joseph E Potter  4
Affiliations

Change in abortion services after implementation of a restrictive law in Texas

Daniel Grossman et al. Contraception. 2014 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: In 2013, Texas passed omnibus legislation restricting abortion services. Provisions restricting medical abortion, banning most procedures after 20 weeks and requiring physicians to have hospital-admitting privileges were enforced in November 2013; by September 2014, abortion facilities must meet the requirements of ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs). We aimed to rapidly assess the change in abortion services after the first three provisions went into effect.

Study design: We requested information from all licensed Texas abortion facilities on abortions performed between November 2012 and April 2014, including the abortion method and gestational age (< 12 weeks vs. ≥ 12 weeks).

Results: In May 2013, there were 41 facilities providing abortion in Texas; this decreased to 22 in November 2013. Both clinics closed in the Rio Grande Valley, and all but one closed in West Texas. Comparing November 2012-April 2013 to November 2013-April 2014, there was a 13% decrease in the abortion rate (from 12.9 to 11.2 abortions/1000 women age 15-44). Medical abortion decreased by 70%, from 28.1% of all abortions in the earlier period to 9.7% after November 2013 (p<0.001). Second-trimester abortion increased from 13.5% to 13.9% of all abortions (p<0.001). Only 22% of abortions were performed in the state's six ASCs.

Conclusions: The closure of clinics and restrictions on medical abortion in Texas appear to be associated with a decline in the in-state abortion rate and a marked decrease in the number of medical abortions.

Implications: Supply-side restrictions on abortion - especially restrictions on medical abortion - can have a profound impact on access to services. Access to abortion care will become even further restricted in Texas when the ASC requirement goes into effect in 2014.

Keywords: Abortion; Access; Law; Restriction; Texas.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Geographic distribution of abortion facilities in Texas, November 2012–April 2014. For each city, dot charts present number of open (solid circle formula image) and closed facilities (open circle formula image) on the Y axis at four key time points on X axis: formula image November 1, 2012–April 30, 2013 formula image October 31, 2013 formula image November 1, 2013 formula image April 30, 2014
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of women age 15–44 living in a county at various distances from the nearest Texas abortion provider on various dates The blue line (diamonds) represents the number of women age 15–44 in a county >50 miles from the nearest Texas abortion provider, the red line (squares) represents those living >100 miles from the nearest Texas provider, and the green line (triangles) represents those living >200 miles from the nearest Texas provider.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Nash E, Gold RB, Rowan A, Rathbun G, Vierboom Y. [cited June 15, 2014];Laws affecting reproductive health and rights: 2013 state policy review. 2014 Jan; Available from: http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/updates/2013/statetrends42013.html.
    1. Joyce T. The supply-side economics of abortion. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(16):1466–1469. - PubMed
    1. Joyce TJ, Henshaw SK, Dennis A, Finer LB, Blanchard K. The Impact of State Mandatory Counseling and Waiting Period Laws on Abortion: A Literature Review. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2009.
    1. Colman S, Joyce T. Regulating abortion: impact on patients and providers in Texas. J Policy Anal Manage. 2011;30:775–797.
    1. [cited June 20, 2014];Brief of amici curiae American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Medical Association in support of plaintiffs-appellees and in support of affirmance. Available from: http://www.acog.org/~/media/News%20Releases/20131220Release.pdf.)

Publication types

MeSH terms