Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr 5;5(3):178.
doi: 10.4172/2155-9627.1000178.

Multimedia Informed Consent Tool for a Low Literacy African Research Population: Development and Pilot-Testing

Affiliations

Multimedia Informed Consent Tool for a Low Literacy African Research Population: Development and Pilot-Testing

Muhammed Olanrewaju Afolabi et al. J Clin Res Bioeth. .

Abstract

Background: International guidelines recommend the use of appropriate informed consent procedures in low literacy research settings because written information is not known to guarantee comprehension of study information.

Objectives: This study developed and evaluated a multimedia informed consent tool for people with low literacy in an area where a malaria treatment trial was being planned in The Gambia.

Methods: We developed the informed consent document of the malaria treatment trial into a multimedia tool integrating video, animations and audio narrations in three major Gambian languages. Acceptability and ease of use of the multimedia tool were assessed using quantitative and qualitative methods. In two separate visits, the participants' comprehension of the study information was measured by using a validated digitised audio questionnaire.

Results: The majority of participants (70%) reported that the multimedia tool was clear and easy to understand. Participants had high scores on the domains of adverse events/risk, voluntary participation, study procedures while lowest scores were recorded on the question items on randomisation. The differences in mean scores for participants' 'recall' and 'understanding' between first and second visits were statistically significant (F (1,41)=25.38, p<0.00001 and (F (1, 41) = 31.61, p<0.00001 respectively.

Conclusions: Our locally developed multimedia tool was acceptable and easy to administer among low literacy participants in The Gambia. It also proved to be effective in delivering and sustaining comprehension of study information across a diverse group of participants. Additional research is needed to compare the tool to the traditional consent interview, both in The Gambia and in other sub-Saharan settings.

Keywords: Development; Informed consent; Technology; The Gambia; Video; Vulnerable population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. The Belmont Report . Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research US. Department of Health & Human Services; Washington DC: 1979. - PubMed
    1. CIOMS . International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences; Geneva: 2002. - PubMed
    1. Nuffield Council on Bioethics . The ethics of research related to healthcare in developing countries. London, UK: 2002.
    1. Afolabi MO, Okebe JU, McGrath N, Larson HJ, Bojang K, et al. Informed consent comprehension in African research settings. Tropical Medicine and International Health. 2014;19(6):625–42. - PubMed
    1. Mandava A, Pace C, Campbell B, Emanuel E, Grady C. The quality of informed consent: mapping the landscape. A review of empirical data from developing and developed countries. J Med Ethics. 2012;38:356–365. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources