Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec;2(2):217-26.
doi: 10.1007/s40121-013-0012-8. Epub 2013 Aug 16.

Amikacin pharmacokinetics during continuous veno-venous hemodialysis

Affiliations

Amikacin pharmacokinetics during continuous veno-venous hemodialysis

Simon W Lam et al. Infect Dis Ther. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: Little is known about the pharmacokinetics of amikacin during continuous renal replacement therapy.

Methods: This prospective observational study included patients admitted to an academic medical center who received amikacin therapy while on continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD) and had at least two serum sample concentrations measured after first-dose administration. First-order pharmacokinetic parameters, patient characteristics, and CVVHD parameters were recorded.

Results: Fifteen patients were included in the analysis. The median (interquartile range) dose of amikacin and dialysate flow rate, based on adjusted body weight, were 14.1 mg/kg (11.7-17.3 mg/kg) and 23.9 mL/kg/h (19.0-29.5 mL/kg/h), respectively. This corresponded with a median C max of 28.5 μg/mL (20.9-39.0 μg/mL). There was a significant correlation between clearance and dialytic dose (for every 1 L/h increase in dialysate flow rate, clearance rate increased by 23.6 mL/min [95% confidence interval 1.7-45.4 mL/min; P = 0.037]).

Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that amikacin dose and interval should be individualized for each patient on CVVHD based on first-dose pharmacokinetic assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Association between Cmax and dose

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, et al. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:1303–10. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200107000-00002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Sprung CL, et al. Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the soap study. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:344–53. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000194725.48928.3A. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vincent JL, Rello J, Marshall J, et al. International study of the prevalence and outcomes of infection in intensive care units. JAMA. 2009;302:2323–9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1754. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System. National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. Am J Infect Control. 2004;32:470–85. - PubMed
    1. Ibrahim EH, Sherman G, Ward S, et al. The influence of inadequate antimicrobial treatment of bloodstream infections on patient outcomes in the ICU setting. Chest. 2000;118:146–55. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.1.146. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources