Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec;18(6):2252-65.
doi: 10.1111/hex.12195. Epub 2014 Aug 18.

Consumer willingness to invest money and time for benefits of lifestyle behaviour change: an application of the contingent valuation method

Adrienne F G Alayli-Goebbels  1 , Job van Exel  2 , André J H A Ament  1 , Nanne K de Vries  3 , Sandra D M Bot  4 , Johan L Severens  2   5
Affiliations

Consumer willingness to invest money and time for benefits of lifestyle behaviour change: an application of the contingent valuation method

Adrienne F G Alayli-Goebbels et al. Health Expect. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To use contingent valuation (CV) to derive individual consumer values for both health and broader benefits of a public-health intervention directed at lifestyle behaviour change (LBC) and to examine the feasibility and validity of the method.

Method: Participants of a lifestyle intervention trial (n = 515) were invited to complete an online CV survey. Respondents (n = 312) expressed willingness to invest money and time for changes in life expectancy, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and broader quality of life aspects. Internal validity was tested for by exploring associations between explanatory variables (i.e. income, paid work, experience and risk factors for cardiovascular diseases) and willingness to invest, and by examining ordering effects and respondents' sensitivity to the scope of the benefits.

Results: The majority of respondents (94.3%) attached value to benefits of LBC, and 87.4% were willing to invest both money and time. Respondents were willing to invest more for improvements in HRQOL (€42/month; 3 h/week) and broader quality of life aspects (€40/month; 2.6 h/week) than for improvements in life expectancy (€24/month; 2 h/week). Protest answers were limited (3%) and findings regarding internal validity were mixed.

Conclusion: The importance of broader quality of life outcomes to consumers suggests that these outcomes are relevant to be considered in the decision making. Our research showed that CV is a feasible method to value both health and broader outcomes of LBC, but generalizability to other areas of public health still needs to be examined. Mixed evidence regarding internal validity pleads for caution to use CV as only the base for decision making.

Keywords: contingent valuation; decision making; economic evaluation; lifestyle behaviour; public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Drummond M, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart GL. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
    1. Weatherly H, Drummond M, Claxton K et al Methods for assessing the cost‐effectiveness of public health interventions: key challenges and recommendations. Health Policy, 2009; 93: 85–92. - PubMed
    1. McDaid D, Needle J. What use has been made of economic evaluation in public health? A systematic review of the literature In: Dawson S, Morris ZS. (eds) Future Public Health: Burdens, Challenges and Opportunities. Basingstone: Palgrave Mcmillan, 2009: 248–264.
    1. Allin S, Mossialos E, McKee M, Holland W. Making Decisions on Public Health: A Review of Eight Countries. Copenhagen: Wolrd Health Organization, 2004.
    1. Rush B, Shiell A, Hawe P. A census of economic evaluations in health promotion. Health Education Research, 2004; 19: 707–719. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources