Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec;3(1-2):13-26.
doi: 10.1007/s40119-013-0024-1. Epub 2013 Dec 17.

Ivabradine Versus Beta-Blockers in Patients with Conduction Abnormalities or Left Ventricular Dysfunction Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

Affiliations

Ivabradine Versus Beta-Blockers in Patients with Conduction Abnormalities or Left Ventricular Dysfunction Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

Luminita Iliuta et al. Cardiol Ther. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: In patients with conduction abnormalities or left ventricle (LV) dysfunction the use of β-blockers for post cardiac surgery rhythm control is difficult and controversial, with a paucity of information about other drugs such ivabradine used postoperatively. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ivabradine versus metoprolol used perioperatively in cardiac surgery patients with conduction abnormalities or LV systolic dysfunction.

Methods: This was an open-label, randomized clinical trial enrolling 527 patients with conduction abnormalities or LV systolic dysfunction undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting or valvular replacement, randomized to take ivabradine or metoprolol, or metoprolol plus ivabradine. The primary endpoints were the composites of 30-day mortality, in-hospital atrial fibrillation (AF), in-hospital three-degree atrioventricular block and need for pacing, in-hospital worsening heart failure (HF; safety endpoints), duration of hospital stay and immobilization and the above endpoint plus in-hospital bradycardia, gastrointestinal symptoms, sleep disturbances, cold extremities (efficacy plus safety endpoint).

Results: Heart rate reduction and prevention of postoperative AF or tachyarrhythmia with combined therapy was more effective than with metoprolol or ivabradine alone during the immediate postoperative management of cardiac surgery patients. In the Ivabradine group, the frequency of early postoperative pacing and HF worsening was smaller than in the Metoprolol group and in combined therapy group. The frequency of primary combined endpoint was lower in the combined Ivabradine + Metoprolol group compared with the monotherapy groups.

Conclusion: Considering efficacy and safety, the cardiac rhythm reduction after open heart surgery in patients with conduction abnormalities or LV dysfunction with ivabradine plus metoprolol emerged as the best treatment in this trial.

Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Beta-blocker; Cardiac surgery; Cardiology; Coronary artery bypass surgery; Ivabradine; Metoprolol; Postoperative arrhythmias; Valvular replacement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study phases and distribution of study population. Minim at least, pts patients
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Study groups structure. CABG coronary artery bypass grafting. LV left ventricle
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The relative risks of ivabradine and combined therapy with ivabradine and metoprolol versus metoprolol monotherapy for early postoperative atrial fibrillation, complete atrioventricular block/need for pacing and postoperative heart failure worsening. AV atrioventricular
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Kaplan–Meier curves for the composite endpoint of 30-day mortality, in-hospital atrial fibrillation/arrhythmias, in-hospital atrioventricular block/need for pacing, or in-hospital heart failure worsening in the three treatment groups: ivabradine alone versus combined ivabradine plus metoprolol and metoprolol alone. BAV atrioventricular block, HF heart failure

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mina K, Chung MD. Cardiac surgery: postoperative arrhythmias. Crit Care Med. 2000;28(10 Suppl):N136–44. - PubMed
    1. Helgadottir S, Sigurdsson MI, Ingvarsdottir IL, Arnar DO, Gudbjartsson T. Atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery: risk analysis and long-term survival. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;7:87. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-7-87. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taylor G, Malik S, Colliver J, et al. Usefulness of AF as a predictor of stroke after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. Am J Cardiol. 1987;60:905–907. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)91045-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zaman AG, Archbold RA, Helft G, Paul EA, Curzen NP, Mills PG. AF after coronary artery bypass surgery: a model for preoperative risk stratification. Circulation. 2000;101:1403–1408. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.101.12.1403. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Auer J, Weber T, Berent R, et al. Risk factors of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. J Card Surg. 2005;20(5):425–431. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2005.2004123.x. - DOI - PubMed