Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Aug 18:7:25214.
doi: 10.3402/gha.v7.25214. eCollection 2014.

Interpretive focus groups: a participatory method for interpreting and extending secondary analysis of qualitative data

Michelle Redman-MacLaren  1 , Jane Mills  2 , Rachael Tommbe  3
Affiliations

Interpretive focus groups: a participatory method for interpreting and extending secondary analysis of qualitative data

Michelle Redman-MacLaren et al. Glob Health Action. .

Abstract

Background: Participatory approaches to qualitative research practice constantly change in response to evolving research environments. Researchers are increasingly encouraged to undertake secondary analysis of qualitative data, despite epistemological and ethical challenges. Interpretive focus groups can be described as a more participative method for groups to analyse qualitative data.

Objective: To facilitate interpretive focus groups with women in Papua New Guinea to extend analysis of existing qualitative data and co-create new primary data. The purpose of this was to inform a transformational grounded theory and subsequent health promoting action.

Design: A two-step approach was used in a grounded theory study about how women experience male circumcision in Papua New Guinea. Participants analysed portions or 'chunks' of existing qualitative data in story circles and built upon this analysis by using the visual research method of storyboarding.

Results: New understandings of the data were evoked when women in interpretive focus groups analysed the data 'chunks'. Interpretive focus groups encouraged women to share their personal experiences about male circumcision. The visual method of storyboarding enabled women to draw pictures to represent their experiences. This provided an additional focus for whole-of-group discussions about the research topic.

Conclusions: Interpretive focus groups offer opportunity to enhance trustworthiness of findings when researchers undertake secondary analysis of qualitative data. The co-analysis of existing data and co-generation of new data between research participants and researchers informed an emergent transformational grounded theory and subsequent health promoting action.

Keywords: Papua New Guinea; decolonizing methodologies; interpretive focus groups; qualitative research; secondary analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Young women draw their storyboards, supported by Rachael Tommbe (Reproduced with permission by M. Redman-MacLaren).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stringer E. Action research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2014.
    1. Mills J, Birks M. Qualitative methodology: a practical guide. London: Sage; 2014.
    1. Irwin S. Qualitative secondary data analysis: ethics, epistemology and context. Prog Dev Stud. 2013;13:295–306.
    1. Whiteside M, Mills J, McCalman J. Using secondary data for grounded theory analysis. Aust Soc Work. 2012. pp. 1–13. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0312407X.2011.645165#.U59_bPm... [cited 5 August 2014]. - DOI
    1. Bainbridge R, Whiteside M, McCalman J. Being, knowing, and doing: a phronetic approach to constructing grounded theory with Aboriginal Australian partners. Qual Health Res. 2013;23:275–88. doi: 10.1177/1049732312467853. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources