Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep 22;47(12):3222-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Aug 7.

Stiffness versus prestress relationship at subcellular length scale

Affiliations

Stiffness versus prestress relationship at subcellular length scale

Elizabeth P Canović et al. J Biomech. .

Abstract

Local intracellular variations of cell mechanical properties, which are essential for vital cellular functions, have not been well characterized and are poorly understood. Here, we used results from our previous biomechanical imaging study to obtain relationships between intracellular shear modulus and prestress. We found that the subcellular shear modulus vs. prestress relationships exhibited positive linear correlations, consistent with previously observed behaviors at the whole cell and tissue levels. This, in turn, suggests that the prestress may be a unifying factor that determines material properties of living matter at different length scales.

Keywords: Cell mechanics; Imaging; Prestress; Stiffness; Traction forces.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement

There is no conflict of interest of any kind.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative plots of intracellular shear modulus vs. prestress data (dots) and the corresponding linear regressions (solid line) for A) a cell with a strong correlation (Cell #18 from Table 1), B) a cell with a strong correlation (Cell #3 from Table 1), C) a cell with a moderate correlation (Cell #6 from Table 1), and D) a cell with a weak correlation (Cell #5 from Table 1).

References

    1. Aratyn-Schaus Y, Oakes PW, Gardel ML. Dynamic and structural signatures of lamellar actomyosin force generation. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 2011;22:1330–1339. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barbone PE, Oberai AA. Elastic modulus imaging: some exact solutions of the compressible elastography inverse problem. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2007;52:1577–1593. - PubMed
    1. Baudriller H, Maurin B, Cañadas P, Montcourrier P, Parmeggiani A, Bettache N. Form-finding complex tensegrity structures: application to cell cytoskeletal modelling. Comptes Rendus Mécanique. 2006;334:662–668.
    1. Bursać P, McGrath CV, Eisenberg SR, Stamenović D. A microstructural model of elastostatic properties of articular cartilage in confined compression. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. 2000;122:347–353. - PubMed
    1. Canović EP, Seidl DT, Polio SR, Oberai AA, Barbone EP, Stamenović D, Smith ML. Biomechanical imaging of cell stiffness and prestress with subcellular resolution. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology. 2013 doi: 10.1007/s10237-013-0526-8. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources