Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of different human papillomavirus serological and DNA criteria on vaccine efficacy estimates

Krystle A Lang Kuhs et al. Am J Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Two trials of clinically approved human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines, Females United to Unilaterally Reduce Endo/Ectocervical Disease (FUTURE I/II) and the Papilloma Trial Against Cancer in Young Adults (PATRICIA), reported a 22% difference in vaccine efficacy (VE) against cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse in HPV-naïve subcohorts; however, serological testing methods and the HPV DNA criteria used to define HPV-unexposed women differed between the studies. We applied previously described methods to simulate these HPV-naïve subcohorts within the Costa Rica HPV16/18 Vaccine Trial and assessed how these criteria affect the estimation of VE. We applied 2 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) thresholds for HPV16 and HPV18 seropositivity (8 and 7 ELISA units/mL, respectively, for PATRICIA; 54 and 65 ELISA units/mL, respectively, for FUTURE I/II (to approximate the competitive Luminex immunoassay)) and 2 criteria for HPV DNA positivity (12 oncogenic HPV types, plus HPV66 and 68/73 for PATRICIA; or plus HPV6 and 11 for FUTURE I/II). VE was computed in the 2 naïve subcohorts. Using the FUTURE I/II and PATRICIA criteria, VE estimates against cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse, regardless of HPV type, were 69.0% (95% confidence interval: 40.3%, 84.9%) and 80.8% (95% confidence interval: 52.6%, 93.5%), respectively (P = 0.1). Although the application of FUTURE I/II criteria to our cohort resulted in the inclusion of more sexually experienced women, methodological differences did not fully explain the VE differences.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00128661.

Keywords: human papillomavirus; methodological differences; naïve population; vaccine efficacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
CONSORT diagram for naïve cohort 1 in the Costa Rica HPV16/18 Vaccine Trial, 2004–2005. Women were excluded on the basis of 1) human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, or 68/73 DNA positivity and 2) HPV16 or HPV18 seropositivity defined by standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) cutoffs of 8 ELISA units/mL or 7 ELISA units/mL, respectively.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
CONSORT diagram for naïve cohort 2 in the Costa Rica HPV16/18 Vaccine Trial, 2004–2005. Women were excluded on the basis of 1) human papillomavirus (HPV) type 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, or 59 DNA positivity and 2) HPV16 or HPV18 seropositivity, defined by modified enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) cutoffs of 54 ELISA units/mL or 65 ELISA units/mL, respectively.

References

    1. Schiller JT, Castellsagué X, Garland SM. A review of clinical trials of human papillomavirus prophylactic vaccines. Vaccine. 2012;30(suppl 5):F123–F138. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hildesheim A, Herrero R, Wacholder S, et al. Effect of human papillomavirus 16/18 L1 viruslike particle vaccine among young women with preexisting infection: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2007;298(7):743–753. - PubMed
    1. Muñoz N, Kjaer SK, Sigurdsson K, et al. Impact of human papillomavirus (HPV)-6/11/16/18 vaccine on all HPV-associated genital diseases in young women. JNatl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(5):325–339. - PubMed
    1. Lehtinen M, Paavonen J, Wheeler CM, et al. Overall efficacy of HPV-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against grade 3 or greater cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: 4-year end-of-study analysis of the randomised, double-blind PATRICIA Trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(1):89–99. - PubMed
    1. Safaeian M, Ghosh A, Porras C, et al. Direct comparison of HPV16 serological assays used to define HPV-naive women in HPV vaccine trials. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;21(9):1547–1554. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data