Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Aug 21;9(8):e105418.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105418. eCollection 2014.

Facial expression training optimises viewing strategy in children and adults

Affiliations

Facial expression training optimises viewing strategy in children and adults

Petra M J Pollux et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

This study investigated whether training-related improvements in facial expression categorization are facilitated by spontaneous changes in gaze behaviour in adults and nine-year old children. Four sessions of a self-paced, free-viewing training task required participants to categorize happy, sad and fear expressions with varying intensities. No instructions about eye movements were given. Eye-movements were recorded in the first and fourth training session. New faces were introduced in session four to establish transfer-effects of learning. Adults focused most on the eyes in all sessions and increased expression categorization accuracy after training coincided with a strengthening of this eye-bias in gaze allocation. In children, training-related behavioural improvements coincided with an overall shift in gaze-focus towards the eyes (resulting in more adult-like gaze-distributions) and towards the mouth for happy faces in the second fixation. Gaze-distributions were not influenced by the expression intensity or by the introduction of new faces. It was proposed that training enhanced the use of a uniform, predominantly eyes-biased, gaze strategy in children in order to optimise extraction of relevant cues for discrimination between subtle facial expressions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Accuracy: Proportion correct responses (% correct) as a function of Training (S1 = Session 1, S2 = Session 2, S3 = Session 3, S4-trained = Session 4, trained faces, S4-new = Session 4, new faces), Emotion (Fearful, Happy or Sad) and Intensity (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 or 100%) and Age-group (Adults and Children).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Response Times (RT) in milliseconds (ms) for Adults and children as a function of Training Session.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Total number of fixations made on average during face viewing (Nr Fix) as a function of Training and Emotion.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Average Proportions Viewing Time (considering all fixations during face-viewing) as a function of Training session, ROI (Region of Interest), Emotion and Age-group.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Average Proportions Viewing Time (second fixation only) as a function of Training session, ROI, Emotion and Age-group.

References

    1. Carton JS, Kessler EA, Pape CL (1999) Nonverbal decoding skills and relationship well-being in adults. J Noverb Behav 23: 91–100.
    1. Nowicki S Jr, Duke MP (1994) Individual differences in the nonverbal communication of affect: The diagnostic analysis of nonverbal accuracy scale. J Noverb Behav 19, 9–35.
    1. Durand K, Gallay M, Seigneuric A, Robichon F, Baudouin J (2007) The development of facial emotion recognition: The role of configural information. J Exp Child Psychol 97: 14–27. - PubMed
    1. Gao X, Maurer D (2010) A happy story: Developmental changes in children's sensitivity to facial expressions of varying intensities. J Exp Child Psychol 10: 67–86. - PubMed
    1. Widen SC (2013) Children's interpretation of facial expressions: The long path from valence-based to specific discrete categories. Emotion Rev 5: 72–77.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources