Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct;146(4 Suppl):e87S-e102S.
doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0738.

System-level planning, coordination, and communication: care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement

Jeffrey R Dichter, Robert K Kanter, David Dries, Valerie Luyckx, Matthew L Lim, John Wilgis, Michael R Anderson, Babak Sarani, Nathaniel Hupert, Ryan Mutter, Asha V Devereaux, Michael D Christian, Niranjan Kissoon; Task Force for Mass Critical Care; Task Force for Mass Critical Care
Collaborators

System-level planning, coordination, and communication: care of the critically ill and injured during pandemics and disasters: CHEST consensus statement

Jeffrey R Dichter et al. Chest. 2014 Oct.

Abstract

Background: System-level planning involves uniting hospitals and health systems, local/regional government agencies, emergency medical services, and other health-care entities involved in coordinating and enabling care in a major disaster. We reviewed the literature and sought expert opinions concerning system-level planning and engagement for mass critical care due to disasters or pandemics and offer suggestions for system-planning, coordination, communication, and response. The suggestions in this chapter are important for all of those involved in a pandemic or disaster with multiple critically ill or injured patients, including front-line clinicians, hospital administrators, and public health or government officials.

Methods: The American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) consensus statement development process was followed in developing suggestions. Task Force members met in person to develop nine key questions believed to be most relevant for system-planning, coordination, and communication. A systematic literature review was then performed for relevant articles and documents, reports, and other publications reported since 1993. No studies of sufficient quality were identified upon which to make evidence-based recommendations. Therefore, the panel developed expert opinion-based suggestions using a modified Delphi process.

Results: Suggestions were developed and grouped according to the following thematic elements: (1) national government support of health-care coalitions/regional health authorities (HC/RHAs), (2) teamwork within HC/RHAs, (3) system-level communication, (4) system-level surge capacity and capability, (5) pediatric patients and special populations, (6) HC/RHAs and networks, (7) models of advanced regional care systems, and (8) the use of simulation for preparedness and planning.

Conclusions: System-level planning is essential to provide care for large numbers of critically ill patients because of disaster or pandemic. It also entails a departure from the routine, independent system and involves all levels from health-care institutions to regional health authorities. National government support is critical, as are robust communication systems and advanced planning supported by realistic exercises.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1 –
Figure 1 –
National governments and suggestions for support of disaster preparedness (top three boxes) and suggestions for continuing to work with local governments and health-care coalition/regional health authorities to facilitate preparedness planning (bottom two boxes).
Figure 2 –
Figure 2 –
Summary of suggestions for health-care coalition/regional health authority leadership regarding communication.
Figure 3 –
Figure 3 –
Summary of suggestions for health-care coalition/regional health authority leadership regarding the number and location of surge resources, and important surge priorities.
Figure 4 –
Figure 4 –
Summary of suggestions for health-care coalition/regional health authority leadership regarding pediatric resources (which may also be used for special populations).
Figure 5 –
Figure 5 –
Pyramid illustrating levels of priorities for successful advanced regional care systems.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Barbera JA, Macintyre AG. Medical surge capacity and capability: a management system for integrating medical and health resources during large-scale emergencies. US Department of Health and Human Services. Washington, DC: The CNA Corporation Institute for Public Research; 2007.
    1. Hanfling D. Role of regional healthcare coalitions in managing and coordinating disaster response. Paper presented at: 2013 Workshop on Nationwide Response to an Improvised Nuclear Device Attack; January 23-24, 2013; Washington DC.
    1. McMaster R, Baber C. Multi-agency operations: cooperation during flooding. Appl Ergon. 2012;43(1):38-47. - PubMed
    1. Courtney B, Toner E, Waldhorn R, et al. Healthcare coalitions: the new foundation for national healthcare preparedness and response for catastrophic health emergencies. Biosecur Bioterror. 2009;7(2):153-163. - PubMed
    1. Farmer JC, Carlton PK., Jr Providing critical care during a disaster: the interface between disaster response agencies and hospitals. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(3)(suppl):S56-S59. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms