Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Nov;112(5):932-40.
doi: 10.1160/TH13-11-0971. Epub 2014 Aug 21.

Comparative field study: impact of laboratory assay variability on the assessment of recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) activity

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparative field study: impact of laboratory assay variability on the assessment of recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) activity

Jurg M Sommer et al. Thromb Haemost. 2014 Nov.

Abstract

Due to variability in the one-stage clotting assay, the performance of new factor IX (FIX) products should be assessed in this assay. The objective of this field study was to evaluate the accuracy of measuring recombinant FIX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) activity in clinical haemostasis laboratories using the one-stage clotting assay. Human haemophilic donor plasma was spiked with rFIXFc or BeneFIX® at 0.80, 0.20, or 0.05 IU/ml based on label potency. Laboratories tested blinded samples using their routine one-stage assay and in-house FIX plasma standard. The mean spike recoveries for BeneFIX (n=30 laboratories) were 121 %, 144 %, and 168 % of expected at nominal 0.80, 0.20, and 0.05 IU/ml concentrations, respectively. Corresponding rFIXFc spike recoveries were 88 %, 107 %, and 132 % of expected, respectively. All BeneFIX concentrations were consistently overestimated by most laboratories. rFIXFc activity was reagent-dependent; ellagic acid and silica gave higher values than kaolin, which underestimated rFIXFc. BeneFIX demonstrated significantly reduced chromogenic assay activity relative to one-stage assay results and nominal activity, while rFIXFc activity was close to nominal activity at three concentrations with better dilution linearity than the typical one-stage assay. In conclusion, laboratory- and reagent-specific assay variabilities were revealed, with progressively higher variability at lower FIX concentrations. Non-parallelism against the FIX plasma standard was observed in all one-stage assays with rFIXFc and BeneFIX, leading to significant overestimation of FIX activity at lower levels and generally high inter-laboratory variability. Compared to the accuracy currently achieved in clinical laboratories when measuring other rFIX products, most laboratories measured rFIXFc activity with acceptable accuracy and reliability using routine one-stage assay methods and commercially available plasma standards.

Keywords: Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT); blood; coagulation factor IX; coagulation tests; haemophilia B; standardisation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest J. M. Sommer, Y. Buyue, S. Bardan, R. T. Peters, H. Jiang, G. D. Kamphaus, and G. F. Pierce are employees of Biogen Idec. E. Gray is an advisor for Biogen Idec, but received no material compensation.

Figures

Figure 1: Mean (SD) FIX activity by one-stage clotting assay (n = 30 laboratories)
Figure 1: Mean (SD) FIX activity by one-stage clotting assay (n = 30 laboratories)
. SD, standard deviation; FIX, factor IX; rFIXFc, recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein; IU, International Units. Dashed line represents the expected recovery. Dotted lines indicate the degree of non-linearity observed by the average laboratory across the three concentrations of BeneFIX or rFIXFc.
Figure 2: Median (25 %/75 %) FIX activity in the one-stage clotting assay by type of aPTT activating reagent for BeneFIX and rFIXFc at concentrations of 0.80 IU/ml (A), 0.20 IU/ml (B), and 0.05 IU/ml (C)
Figure 2: Median (25 %/75 %) FIX activity in the one-stage clotting assay by type of aPTT activating reagent for BeneFIX and rFIXFc at concentrations of 0.80 IU/ml (A), 0.20 IU/ml (B), and 0.05 IU/ml (C)
. FIX, factor IX; aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; rFIXFc, recombi-nant factor IX Fc fusion protein; IU, International Units; EA, ellagic acid. *p < 0.05.
Figure 3: Individual laboratory one-stage assay results for Bene-FIX and rFIXFc at concentrations of 0.80 IU/ml (A), 0.20 IU/ml (B), and 0.05 IU/ml (C)
Figure 3: Individual laboratory one-stage assay results for Bene-FIX and rFIXFc at concentrations of 0.80 IU/ml (A), 0.20 IU/ml (B), and 0.05 IU/ml (C)
. rFIXFc, recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein; IU, International Units; FIX, factor IX; P, polyphenols. Dashed line represents the expected recovery.
Figure 4: In-house confirmation of one-stage assay reagent-specific differences
Figure 4: In-house confirmation of one-stage assay reagent-specific differences
. rFIXFc, recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein; IU, International Units. Dashed line represents the expected recovery. The Stago reagents PTT-A and C. K. Prest were evaluated on a Stago Compact analyser, while all other reagents were evaluated on a Sysmex CA-1500 system.

References

    1. Coppola A, Di CM, Di Minno MN. Treatment of hemophilia: a review of current advances and ongoing issues. J Blood Med. 2010;1:183–195. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Langdell RD, Wagner RH, Brinkhous KM. Effect of antihemophilic factor on one-stage clotting tests; a presumptive test for hemophilia and a simple one-stage antihemophilic factor assay procedure. J Lab Clin Med. 1953;41:637–647. - PubMed
    1. Ingerslev J.Laboratory assays in hemophiliaIn:Textbook of Hemophilia Wiley-Blackwell; 2010
    1. Barrowcliffe TW. Insights from factor IX activation studies with chromogenic assays: implications of disparate product results. Haemophilia. 2010;16 06:9–12. - PubMed
    1. Pouplard C, Trossaert M, LE QA. Influence of source of phospholipids for aPTT-based factor IX assays and potential consequences for the diagnosis of mild haemophilia B. Haemophilia. 2009;15:365–368. - PubMed

Publication types