Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb;23(2):523-9.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3234-8. Epub 2014 Aug 22.

Long-term outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff treatment

Affiliations

Long-term outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff treatment

Pietro Spennacchio et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: Arthroscopic techniques have become the gold standard in the operative management of several pathologic conditions of the shoulder. The purpose of this systematic review was to present the long-term outcomes following arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff pathology.

Methods: A comprehensive literature review was performed to identify studies reporting clinical or structural results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs (ARCRs) at least 5 years after surgery.

Results: Ten articles were selected, which described 483 procedures. Study type, surgical approaches, complications, evidences of structural integrity of the repaired lesions, preoperative and postoperative functional scores are identified, analyzed and discussed. Satisfactory results are presented by all authors, and significant postoperative improvement is reported by all the studies with available preoperative data; 16 of 483 cases were re-operated.

Conclusion: Although high-level evidences are lacking, ARCR appears to be an effective and safe option to treat the symptoms of rotator cuff tears and to provide successful clinical results durable with time. Current evidences are insufficient to clearly define the relationship between structural integrity of repaired cuffs and long-term clinical outcome. The available data do not allow to draw conclusions regarding the long-term superiority of double-row versus single-row repairs.

Level of evidence: Review of level II, III and IV studies, Level IV.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. PLoS One. 2014 Apr 11;9(4):e94421 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 May;91(5):1055-62 - PubMed
    1. Arthroscopy. 2012 Nov;28(11):1587-91 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Mar;88(3):472-9 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991 Aug;73(7):982-9 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources