Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct;93(10):959-65.
doi: 10.1177/0022034514546165. Epub 2014 Aug 21.

Projections of U.S. Edentulism prevalence following 5 decades of decline

Affiliations

Projections of U.S. Edentulism prevalence following 5 decades of decline

G D Slade et al. J Dent Res. 2014 Oct.

Abstract

After decades of decline in prevalence of complete tooth loss (edentulism), the trend continues to be misinterpreted, producing flawed projections and misdirected health goals. We investigated population trends in edentulism among U.S. adults aged ≥ 15 yr by creating time-series data from 5 national cross-sectional health surveys: 1957-1958 (n ≈ 100,000 adults), 1971-1975 (n = 14,655 adults), 1988-1998 (n = 18,011 adults), 1999-2002 (n = 12,336 adults), and 2009-2012 (n = 10,522 adults). Birth cohort analysis was used to isolate age and cohort effects. Geographic and sociodemographic variation in prevalence was investigated with a sixth U.S. survey of 432,519 adults conducted in 2010. Prevalence through 2050 was projected with age-cohort regression models using Monte-Carlo simulation of prediction intervals. Across the 5-decade observation period, edentulism prevalence declined from 18.9% in 1957-1958 (95% confidence limits: 18.4%, 19.4%) to 4.9% in 2009-2012 (95% confidence limits: 4.0%, 5.8%). The most influential determinant of the decline was the passing of generations born before the 1940s, whose rate of edentulism incidence (5%-6% per decade of age) far exceeded later cohorts (1%-3% per decade of age). High-income households experienced a greater relative decline, although a smaller absolute decline, than low-income households. By 2010, edentulism was a rare condition in high-income households, and it had contracted geographically to states with disproportionately high poverty. With the passing of generations born in the mid-20th century, the rate of decline in edentulism is projected to slow, reaching 2.6% (95% prediction limits: 2.1%, 3.1%) by 2050. The continuing decline will be offset only partially by population growth and population aging such that the predicted number of edentulous people in 2050 (8.6 million; 95% prediction limits: 6.8 million, 10.3 million) will be 30% lower than the 12.2 million edentulous people in 2010.

Keywords: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; cross-sectional studies; dental health surveys; edentulous; socioeconomic factors; time factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Age cohort plot of edentulism prevalence in 8 birth cohorts of U.S. adults in 5 national surveys, 1957-1958 to 2009-2012.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Age-standardized edentulism prevalence among adults aged ≥25 yr, U.S. states, 2010. Source: 2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for the 50 states and the District of Columbia; n = 420,307 participants aged ≥25 yr (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2010a). Age-standardized prevalence in the District of Columbia was 3.0%.

References

    1. Beazoglou T, Eklund S, Heffley D, Meiers J, Brown LJ, Bailit H. (2007). Economic impact of regulating the use of amalgam restorations. Public Health Rep 122:657-663. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beltran-Aguilar ED, Barker LK, Canto MT, Dye BA, Gooch BF, Griffin SO, et al. (2005). Surveillance for dental caries, dental sealants, tooth retention, edentulism, and enamel fluorosis—United States, 1988-1994 and 1999-2002. MMWR Surveill Summ 54:1-43. - PubMed
    1. Billings F. (1912). Chronic focal infections and their etiologic relations to arthritis and nephritis. Arch Intern Med (Chic) 9:484-498.
    1. Billings F. (1930). Focal infection as the cause of general disease. Bull N Y Acad Med 6:759-773. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown LJ. (1994). Trends in tooth loss among U.S. employed adults from 1971 to 1985. J Am Dent Assoc 125:533-540. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources