Comparison between transthoracic lung ultrasound and a clinical method in confirming the position of double-lumen tube in thoracic anaesthesia. A pilot study
- PMID: 25149114
- DOI: 10.1016/j.redar.2014.06.005
Comparison between transthoracic lung ultrasound and a clinical method in confirming the position of double-lumen tube in thoracic anaesthesia. A pilot study
Abstract
Objective: To compare the ability of lung ultrasound and a clinical method in the confirmation of a selective bronchial intubation by left double-lumen tube in elective thoracic surgery.
Material and methods: A prospective and blind, observational study was conducted in the setting of a university hospital operating room assigned for thoracic surgery. A single group of 105 consecutive patients from a total of 130, were included. After blind intubation, the position of the tube was confirmed by clinical and ultrasound assessment. Finally, the fiberoptic bronchoscopy confirmation as a reference standard was used to confirm the position of the tube. Under manual ventilation, by sequentially clamping the tracheal and bronchial limbs of the tube, clinical confirmation was made by auscultation, capnography, visualizing the chest wall expansion, and perceiving the lung compliance in the reservoir bag. Ultrasound confirmation was obtained by visualizing lung sliding, diaphragmatic movements, and the appearance of lung pulse sign.
Results: The sensitivity of the clinical method was 84.5%, with a specificity of 41.1%. The positive and negative likelihood ratio was 1.44 and 0.38, respectively. The sensitivity of the ultrasound method was 98.6%, specificity was 52.9%, with a positive likelihood ratio of 2.10 and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.03. Comparisons between the diagnostic performance of the 2 methods were calculated with McNemar's test. There was a significant difference in sensitivity between the ultrasound method and the clinical method (P=.002). Nevertheless, there was no statistically significant difference in specificity between both methods (P=.34). A p value<.01 was considered statistically significant.
Conclusion: Lung ultrasound was superior to the clinical method in confirming the adequate position of the left double-lumen tube. On the other hand, in confirming the misplacement of the tube, differences between both methods could not be ensured.
Keywords: Anestesia torácica; Auscultación; Auscultation; Ecografía pulmonar; Intubación selectiva; Left double-lumen tube; Lung ultrasound; One-lung ventilation; Selective bronchial intubation; Thoracic anaesthesia; Tubo de doble luz izquierdo; Ventilación unipulmonar.
Copyright © 2014 Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The addition of a brief ultrasound examination to clinical assessment increases the ability to confirm placement of double-lumen endotracheal tubes.J Clin Anesth. 2010 Jun;22(4):246-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2009.07.010. J Clin Anesth. 2010. PMID: 20522353 Clinical Trial.
-
A prospective randomized controlled double-blind study comparing auscultation and lung ultrasonography in the assessment of double lumen tube position in elective thoracic surgeries involving one lung ventilation at a tertiary care cancer institute.Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019 Feb;72(1):24-31. doi: 10.4097/kja.d.17.00081. Epub 2018 Sep 12. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019. PMID: 30205667 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Is flexible bronchoscopy necessary to confirm the position of double-lumen tubes before thoracic surgery?Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Oct;40(4):912-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.01.070. Epub 2011 Jul 29. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011. PMID: 21802958
-
Tracheal, Lung, and Diaphragmatic Applications of M-Mode Ultrasonography in Anesthesiology and Critical Care.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 Jan;35(1):310-322. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.11.051. Epub 2019 Dec 5. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021. PMID: 31883769 Review.
-
The History of One-Lung Anesthesia and the Double-Lumen Tube.J Anesth Hist. 2017 Jul;3(3):76-86. doi: 10.1016/j.janh.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 May 31. J Anesth Hist. 2017. PMID: 28842155 Review.
Cited by
-
Perioperative Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) for Anesthesiologists: an Overview.Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020 Mar 21;24(5):20. doi: 10.1007/s11916-020-0847-0. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2020. PMID: 32200432 Review.
-
Point-of-care ultrasound versus auscultation in determining the position of double-lumen tube.Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Mar;97(13):e9311. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009311. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018. PMID: 29595696 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A prospective comparative study to evaluate the utility of lung ultrasonography to improve the accuracy of traditional clinical methods to confirm position of left sided double lumen tube in elective thoracic surgeries.Indian J Anaesth. 2015 Aug;59(8):476-81. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.162983. Indian J Anaesth. 2015. PMID: 26379290 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of Lung Ultrasound in the Management of the Critically Ill Neonate-A Narrative Review and Practical Guide.Children (Basel). 2021 Jul 24;8(8):628. doi: 10.3390/children8080628. Children (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34438519 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Lung ultrasound is non-inferior to bronchoscopy for confirmation of double-lumen endotracheal tube positioning: a randomized controlled noninferiority study.BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 May 30;22(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01707-4. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022. PMID: 35637457 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical