Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Nov;140(6):1534-55.
doi: 10.1037/a0037830. Epub 2014 Aug 25.

Phonological coding during reading

Affiliations
Review

Phonological coding during reading

Mallorie Leinenger. Psychol Bull. 2014 Nov.

Abstract

The exact role that phonological coding (the recoding of written, orthographic information into a sound based code) plays during silent reading has been extensively studied for more than a century. Despite the large body of research surrounding the topic, varying theories as to the time course and function of this recoding still exist. The present review synthesizes this body of research, addressing the topics of time course and function in tandem. The varying theories surrounding the function of phonological coding (e.g., that phonological codes aid lexical access, that phonological codes aid comprehension and bolster short-term memory, or that phonological codes are largely epiphenomenal in skilled readers) are first outlined, and the time courses that each maps onto (e.g., that phonological codes come online early [prelexical] or that phonological codes come online late [postlexical]) are discussed. Next the research relevant to each of these proposed functions is reviewed, discussing the varying methodologies that have been used to investigate phonological coding (e.g., response time methods, reading while eye-tracking or recording EEG and MEG, concurrent articulation) and highlighting the advantages and limitations of each with respect to the study of phonological coding. In response to the view that phonological coding is largely epiphenomenal in skilled readers, research on the use of phonological codes in prelingually, profoundly deaf readers is reviewed. Finally, implications for current models of word identification (activation-verification model, Van Orden, 1987; dual-route model, e.g., M. Coltheart, Rastle, Perry, Langdon, & Ziegler, 2001; parallel distributed processing model, Seidenberg & McClelland, 1989) are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abramson M, Goldinger SD. What the reader's eye tells the mind's ear: Silent reading activates inner speech. Perception & Psychophysics. 1997;59:1059–1068. Doi: 10.3758/BF03205520. - PubMed
    1. Alexander JD, Nygaard LC. Reading voices and hearing text: talker-specific auditory imagery in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2008;34:446–459. Doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.446. - PubMed
    1. Anderson RE. Speech imagery is not always faster than visual imagery. Memory & Cognition. 1982;10:371–380. Doi: 10.3758/BF03202429. - PubMed
    1. Andoh J, Artiges E, Pallier C, Rivière D, Mangin JF, Cachia A, Plaze M, Paillère-Martinot ML, Martinot JL. Modulation of language areas with functional MR image-guided magnetic stimulation. NeuroImage. 2006;29:619–627. Doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.029. - PubMed
    1. Ashby J. Phonology is fundamental in skilled reading: Evidence from ERPs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2010;17:95–100. Doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.1.95. - PubMed

Publication types